Ok just read the rest yeah, i guess it is hard to think in these terms, but you are thinking about "money" i am a decentralized economist, so i know everything about "money".
"money" is just a convenient token for "human energy and extended energy" in the system we have now "money" is issued exclusively as debt.
take the debt away and the system does not function. (as you can see)
"money" decentralized without debt is just (again) a token for "human" (here now) energy its just a token for exchange of things and services.
it can exist just fine in a decentralized environment. but it won't be like how it is now.
About jobs :
I fully agree with you, in a fully automated society there will be no such thing as a job, no one will have to get a job, ect. and population will rebound and grow. However, this writeup is talking about what will happen leading up to the creation of total automation, ai and the whole nine yards. Until that happens there will be a demand for human labor, in one form or another, and there will be a demand for reconciliation for this labor. at a certain point, yes we will be fully automized, and the few things that are not automated yet, but will be, will be voluntary for one reason or another.
Now, the Money:
It doesnt matter whether money is issued like debt in this discussion, and of course money will still "work" in a decentralized society, It is treated, like you have stated, as an extension of human energy. Put in x, get y amount of "money". It doesnt matter whether money is centralized (USD, Yen, ect.) or Decentralized (bartering) in the future, it will still stand that A. Someone will own capital B. someone will "purchase" the labors of that "capital" and C. There will always be a minority that is better/more deserving to make profit off of that capital. So, no matter how money "works" in the future, everything i said in my last statement is still valid.
Nope you are incorrect re money.
It does matter if it is centralized or issued as debt , because all viable "money" competes in decentralized information.
So those "money's" just wouldn't be used, thier "confidence" would be low.
I agree in part with what you are saying re transition, however I think we will get there much more smoothly than some predictions.
ok - wait, just stop for one second...
i'm going to read what you wrote , however you have a pretty big flaw in everything you wrote:
"get a job"
can you define this?
what is a "job" if there is automation and decentralized abundance remind me again why people are "working at a job"
nope what they will be doing is "contributing to society" it would be pretty much voluntary and would work a lot better than how it does now.
you see there are only a tiny few evolutions that humans need to kick this solution off, and as the process is decentralized it could start tomorrow, it could have already started you wouldn't know.
[–] k_digi ago
https://voat.co/v/Contact/comments/153828#submissionTop
see this - contrib if you like - it is not a joke.
[–] mojo4567 [S] ago
Interesting read. The implications of that are enormous, to say the least if they sign the deal
[–] k_digi ago
It's not even close to finished - will outline the Prime mandate which will be :
all the things i mentioned, decentralized abundance domestic anti-grav and communication Sats to network everything (AG obviously)