[–] ryguyhermosa ago (edited ago)
ya, i never thought they were right about walnut, see my article on nov 4th. http://beforeitsnews.com/scandals/2016/11/breaking-the-language-of-a-pedophile-wikileaks-reveals-secret-sex-code-talk-2436730.html
i was prob wrong on domino, but walnut i believe is a immature vulva http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Walnut
[–] pizzathrowaway 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
If "informal dictionary" just means "urban dictionary" I'm really not sure that proves anything. I'd consider this confirmed if there was any kind of law enforcement authority or academic saying that pedophiles really use these words.
[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeah, law enforcement seems real eager to admit this is going on, even back to the Franklin coverup. Acedemic? Really? You have to be trolling.
[–] ThorTheWonderful ago
I thought walnut was accepted as the term for "virgin female child" or "prepubescent female"
[–] im_at_a_desk ago
This is important but I have a feeling its going to interpreted as shilling. im pretty sure there are a few more of these that can be made.
[–] obliviousvoatgoat ago
You should expect an endless campaign of false-flagging that seeks to undermine and discredit you if this thing is actually real.
[–] 7139363? 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
35 minutes ago, already 14 upvotes at this time of night...more of these "logical" style posts questioning Validity of pizzagate getting upvoted
Seriously guys get new occupations, you're helping pedophiles, expose your social media job to the public, be a real hero instead of working for these creeps
[–] dynamol 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
pushing all of the facts without checking them will only harm the investigation. everything should be fact checked, otherwise it'll be the thing the elites/media/whoever grab onto when trying to prove their innocence. if it's not all able to be proven factually then they can just show something that's fake or unverifiable and claim the entire investigation is
[–] dickface8 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've posted this a couple of times around but will post again because it needs to be established also.
"Was just watching David Icke talk pizzagate and he was saying how not everything is a lead, just because there's most certainly a lot to look at here doesn't mean we should run with every thing. This is what someone wrote in the comments the other day in a thread and it got no upvotes, but is something we should all take note of if we wanna stay pure and not go down bunk avenues. It was this: The girl referred to as #CarisJames is actually Caris Cummings, Scott Cummings daughter. CCWoolman is Cory Woolman, Scott's wife. Together they have two daughters, Caris 5 and Mae 8. http://archive.is/9FN8n - Caris http://archive.is/vSqri - Caris drinking milk, Cory Woolman commented http://archive.is/vaDfJ - Caris http://archive.is/0Az6u - Juniper Wills http://archive.is/k0YJ3 - Caris? http://archive.is/NaP2M - Mae http://archive.is/ayA91 - Scott holding Caris http://archive.is/ZwwUn - Mae and Caris http://archive.is/hPsLM - Mae https://i.sli.mg/zF3Ofm.pngPNG - Caris https://i.sli.mg/2FyXrV.pngPNG - Caris RECENT PICS FOUND FOLLOWING LEADS https://i.sli.mg/wa9PAH - old photo on Scotty Cummings FB, Caris? http://archive.is/2uKCz - Scott, Cory, Mae and Caris http://archive.is/s31H5 -
So yeah, if all that is true then we need to take that on board.
[–] pizzagatewillnotdie 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
https://i.sli.mg/zF3Ofm.pngPNG - Caris https://i.sli.mg/2FyXrV.pngPNG
these two links are not working because you have the extra PNG at the end