0
0

[–] im_at_a_desk ago 

This is important but I have a feeling its going to interpreted as shilling. im pretty sure there are a few more of these that can be made.

0
0

[–] obliviousvoatgoat ago 

You should expect an endless campaign of false-flagging that seeks to undermine and discredit you if this thing is actually real.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] fvckh1m_up ago 

blame my eyes

0
0

[–] Stukov ago 

Also I've seen elsewhere where a mine or mining is mentioned (not sure if it was even in the emails), are there any idea what these could mean?

0
0

[–] fvckh1m_up ago 

i've been looking for this fareva

0
0

[–] argosciv ago 

Thanks for putting that together/sharing it.

0
1

[–] Andyomega 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Has anyone thought to find out who the realtor is? They are mentioned as the person in possession of pizza map handkerchief

0
1

[–] PresentDay 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

When anybody says something is 'fact checked', 'verified', 'confirmed', 'sourced' etc..

The first question in everyone's minds should be where is the source?

When you say "appears in informal dictionaries", I want a link/screen/archive of these definitions on an informal dictionary. With the words being defined before pizzagate.

We need to be thorough, and make sure all facts are verifiable and as available as possible.


Also, our popular info graphics should be updated with sources too.

0
0

[–] thezodiac ago 

The fact it's listed in some informal dictionary doesn't mean a lot, if the meaning doesn't make sense when applied to the coded emails.

0
0

[–] PresentDay ago 

That's true, but if we are going to claim that it is listed, we should at least be providing that list.

If somone can research and find sources to create this image, they should be able to provide the sources they used. It would make pizzagate seem more credible and let people find the information easier.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)