[–] francine_rose ago
Even if it seems "coincidental" somebody who designs these knows symbology, understands color theory, etc
Also you get your art submitted for copywrite
[–] pgthrowaway 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
But why is this disturbing? I feel like throwing accusations like that discredits the investigation. It could possibly be a coincidence, I wasn't aware of those symbols before pizzagate. Maybe they weren't either. Of course you can argue that they should change it in light of Pizzagate, but if they did then they would have a legion of investigators accusing them of being pedos in the first place. Alternatively, you could say hey, maybe be aware of this or dig into Unilever for leads, instead of saying "This is disturbing" or implying that Unilever sports a pedo symbol. Please be aware of things like this.
[–] carmencita ago
Also please be aware that we did not think anything of it before because many of us were not aware of the FBI report on the logos and pedo signs. We find it disturbing because of what is connected to those signs. You also should know by now that the elite have been slapped on the hand and also ignored for decades even though many were aware of signs to their being guilty. So those investigators were either suicided or no one printed the evidence. We are experiencing the same right now.
[–] SilenceDoGood [S] ago
I'm not implying anything. I simply presented the facts and if anyone wishes to look more into it, they may do so. What is disturbing to me is after all the time I spent looking at pizzagate, the symbology shows up in my class slides for international business no less. I'm not calling them child traffickers but looking into them seems more than appropriate.
[–] pgthrowaway ago
Right, which is what should be done, but I'm letting you know that the title is click baitey and don't convey the message you're trying to send. Rather, it reads as if Unilever's logo is disturbing.
[–] apparatchik1488 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Hey, good find man.