[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck @Crensch
We need to add new flair options, asap. Flairs needed: "How is this relevant?", "Already discovered", "Needs sources", "Already debunked", "Potential Lead", "New evidence"
Also want to mention we can't assume the CPP incident yesterday was a Flase Flag. To me, it's 50/50 at this point. I don't think we should jump to conclusions, so I'm not a fan of the "CPP False Flag" flair. Thoughts?
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Can only have 10 flairs total.
Dang. OK, I'm going to think about this. Will get back to you guys with thoughts.
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck @Crensch
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] kingkongwaswrong ago
my thoughts
I think the cpp false flag just reflects what the community thinks it is? Open to discussion though
[–] Millennial_Falcon ago (edited ago)
I guess New lead and new evidence could be combined into "new lead or new evidence"
'how is this relevant', and 'needs sources' would be deleted as per the rules wouldn t they?
I agree on "how is this relevant" to an extent. However, relevance is kind of subjective. Maybe an "off-topic" flair?
On, "needs sources," the reason I think we need that one is that a disinformation post could provide tons of sources and bombard readers with info, but could be lacking a source for a key claim.
[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck