[–] NotAnIdiot ago
I agree with this. A good rule of thumb is to look for proof as opposed to connections. We've already made too many connections to deal with.
[–] Truthseeker77 ago
I am absolutely certain that there is video and/or photographic evidence of the crimes. I think it's safe to say that most of these paedophiles have some record of their actions. They get off on it! What evidence is needed to confiscate computers and raid homes? Sad to say, I don't think at this level any judge would risk his life to sign that search warrant!
[–] janedoe77 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Do you really think US courts would take this up? The Supreme Court justice just murdered was a rape and torture pedo (Scalia). I think perhaps thinking internationally, as an open source, sort of a new Nuremburg Trial but overseen by a civil society court, or the ICC if open-source civil society rules would be demanded. I think this is the time to think more creatively because obviously official agencies and courts' and law enforcement hands have been tied. Even if you have all of your evidence, most of it would be thrown out. The 1987 presidio cases threw out most testimony and medical evidence of children with STDs such that only one count of abuse was admitted to. CHeck that San Jose Mercury News piece. The crisis is is that there is NO legal authority or court that they do not control. So I don't know where the "case" would go.
But it need not be GAME OVER. I think people should think more like media people here. Outrage will grow about this internationally if the media pressure is kept up. So, I think FBIanon is right in saying the task here for now is to maybe put this together in a compelling way and circulate it and pressure media to cover it. Maybe have an active media strategy implemented now: a website primer, maps, media contact list, NGO that shit in other words. The Daily Show is dropping this like a hot potato because Alt media has not covered it; they are basking in their fake glory of a fake election upset. I have been reaching out to Alt media but they are really silent as well or faking coverage like Alex Jones, or covering it as just another story. Or covering as a denial and bringing on MI5 agents like Richie Allen. Gossip rags like the Inquirer and the Mirror may print some of this since they already have. The UK is a lynchpin because McCann was a huge media case. There is also a clip that we should use of Trump at the roast the night after the final debate with Clinton -- the ALfred E Smith dinner. One of his jokes (he was actually really good here) was yadda yadda Hillary wrote the book, It Takes a Village; she should know— she's taken plenty." Trump knows and I don't think you can call that circumstantial, not in light of Silsby. But of course Trump frequented sex slave island. These are my ideas on it for now. I am really disgusted by the silence across the political spectrum and the blase attitude by some who have known about SRA but are not using this opportunity to press the issue.
[–] kingforpres ago
My wife is a prosecutor (in a small county) but she laughs when I ask if there is anything here. She says a prelim is no big deal but come trial time it's just too unbelievable for a jury. Possibly even with some real evidence. She just doesn't think a jury would believe the insanity of people this high up being this wild.
[–] stickittotheman ago (edited ago)
So tell us something we dont already know. We aint done here mister. Unbelievable for a jury? What does the jury live on another planet? I thought jurors were exposed to all the same stuff every other person is. If thousands of people, possibly millions already know this is real in numerous countries, i just watched a chinese channel covering it, then why would a jury have their head in the sand? We know we need more evidence and i also realize when the FBI decides to move forward, that they most likely have TONS of evidence already including the smoking gun times 100.
[–] 28leinad82 ago
We just need to somehow have a vault of the most compelling evidence found so far. Keep adding too it, things that are factual and proven. At the moment they get posted, go straight up, and then get replaced by more stuff and almost forgotten about.
[–] noreturn4me ago
Information that has to do with money laundering bi-pass FBI, cops, go straight to IRS. They will help with the investigation and telling you where to look.
[–] CandyPanda ago (edited ago)
You're giving authority figures way too much credit. They're actually just as reckless, spin their wheels, screw up evidence, get victims to confess by bullying and have it thrown out, and on and on. One of the biggest points of doing this is to keep the momentum going so it doesn't fall away like so many other things. Not to mention all the unsolved mysteries that police and detectives couldn't solve.
Many men and women with actual legal experience and the power to prosecute have died trying to get people in power to listen to their case on all of this, which included evidence and witness testimony. This is about bringing the people together for a common cause and investigation and actually getting along for once. Screaming out everything is wrong or people shouldn't post this or that is pretty much how most got banned for even discussing it elsewhere, isn't it? Let people play things out. This playing follow the leader sh*t is crap considering those who demand things are followed are the ones behind it all. Unity and shared collaboration is key to keep things generating for others to share elsewhere.
I find posts like this extremely distracting in their own obnoxious way.