[–] CandyPanda ago (edited ago)
You're giving authority figures way too much credit. They're actually just as reckless, spin their wheels, screw up evidence, get victims to confess by bullying and have it thrown out, and on and on. One of the biggest points of doing this is to keep the momentum going so it doesn't fall away like so many other things. Not to mention all the unsolved mysteries that police and detectives couldn't solve.
Many men and women with actual legal experience and the power to prosecute have died trying to get people in power to listen to their case on all of this, which included evidence and witness testimony. This is about bringing the people together for a common cause and investigation and actually getting along for once. Screaming out everything is wrong or people shouldn't post this or that is pretty much how most got banned for even discussing it elsewhere, isn't it? Let people play things out. This playing follow the leader sh*t is crap considering those who demand things are followed are the ones behind it all. Unity and shared collaboration is key to keep things generating for others to share elsewhere.
I find posts like this extremely distracting in their own obnoxious way.
[–] kingforpres ago
My wife is a prosecutor (in a small county) but she laughs when I ask if there is anything here. She says a prelim is no big deal but come trial time it's just too unbelievable for a jury. Possibly even with some real evidence. She just doesn't think a jury would believe the insanity of people this high up being this wild.
[–] stickittotheman ago (edited ago)
So tell us something we dont already know. We aint done here mister. Unbelievable for a jury? What does the jury live on another planet? I thought jurors were exposed to all the same stuff every other person is. If thousands of people, possibly millions already know this is real in numerous countries, i just watched a chinese channel covering it, then why would a jury have their head in the sand? We know we need more evidence and i also realize when the FBI decides to move forward, that they most likely have TONS of evidence already including the smoking gun times 100.
[–] IUsedtoBeAFed 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Who is JA? Where did he come from? What is his background? What is his real name? Start small with known facts.
[–] noreturn4me ago
Information that has to do with money laundering bi-pass FBI, cops, go straight to IRS. They will help with the investigation and telling you where to look.
[–] NotAnIdiot ago
I agree with this. A good rule of thumb is to look for proof as opposed to connections. We've already made too many connections to deal with.
[–] 28leinad82 ago
We just need to somehow have a vault of the most compelling evidence found so far. Keep adding too it, things that are factual and proven. At the moment they get posted, go straight up, and then get replaced by more stuff and almost forgotten about.
[–] CJJacobs 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Um, yea...no.
We need every last scrap of evidence -- circumstantial or otherwise -- because one never knows which tiny spark of info. is going to ignite the entire flame for the case.
People are organizing it as best they can ....if you need info. better organized (I know I do too), may I suggest doing it on your own computer?
Make folders and subfolders to keep track of things. Also, someone has made a pizzagate wiki somewhere....that should be good for something.
Sorry...we need as many leads as possible to keep rolling in. A good researcher knows how to separate the wheat from the chaff and not get distracted by the process. Good luck!