[–] KnowThyself 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Mod here. I don't live near DC. When is the debate though, that's interesting.
Someone want to buy me a plane ticket lol?
[–] KnowThyself 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Too long to drive, not gonna give too many details about my location.
[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
First of all, you act like a complete ass, and your post history makes me think you're not interested in a fair debate. But here's the important part: We've spent the last few weeks assembling our arguments online. James and anybody else involved is free to come online and refute all of the points we've made. We don't need a physical location to debate, especially when the safety of researchers is at stake. The internet is more than sufficient for James to present his side of the story, and the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
"the internet isn't as vulnerable to manipulation by any parties with a vested interest in this case" LMFAO. wow. that's some serious naivety on your part. your double standard here with your concern for people's safety is amusing. do you apply that same standard to the people you accuse?
[–] krisspykriss 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I am sure someone listed as one the 50 most influential people in DC can handle a few "death threats". The man has Capital Police on speed dial. Just because a few crazies take it to threats and intimidation does not mean the movement as a whole is about threats and intimidation. Or shall we chastise and ostracize the DNC because some crazies beat some people up for voting for Trump. How about demonizing the green movement via the uni-bomber?
Lord, you guys project a lot.
[–] ArchonFall4All 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
James needs to hire a better PR agent. Your attitude is only further tarnishing his image
[–] 7049272? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
EDIT: A keyword in the original request is a red alert that whoever shows up as a "leader" from VOAT will probably be served with a C&D and/or slander lawsuit. I'm positive it will be for millions as I'm sure his business is being affected.
This is a lose-lose situation. The ONLY purpose this serves is to discredit the #pizzagate movement while they take the liberal approach of "discussion" by shouting down facts and going after the person, not the facts. Anybody with an ounce of brains would pass on this or any similar request, especially considering you have made it clear you're one of "them."
Now, if they would give the person from VOAT a high def projector with the promise that he can show ANY image or video he chooses at any time during the "discussion", it could be interesting or at least fun.
By the way, WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU? How are you in charge of setting up a debate? Your request is quite suspicious. Regardless, fuck you very much for the opportunity.
[–] krisspykriss 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Mr. Congeniality goes to a lynching. :)
[–] Pizzainmyass 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
"Fuck you very much for the opportunity" haha fuck that gave me a lil lol
[–] krisspykriss 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Wow, such a congenial request. Sounds about one step short of a lynching. Good luck with that. Mods, I wouldn't bite. Especially if you have no experience with public speaking and public relations.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
step up like men. if you're all so righteous with the truth and have such a command of the "facts" surrounding these accusations then you should have no fear of defending your position in front of anyone.
[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Put Alefantis in a debate on our terms, our questions and in our chosen location.
[–] Codewow 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't think we call them "facts" they're just what you said they were: Accusations. It would be an injustice for people to stop investigating right now when we all know a trafficking ring exists and there are higher ups within it.
[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
I completely agree. This will be a debate where the Alefantis crew has the questions in advance and the whole room is full of their cheerleaders. Not to mention, we were pushed here. Why insist it's a Voat mod? Do they know one? Definately sounds like a setup.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
no.not at all. you'll present your "evidence" piece by piece, have it questioned by someone with an opposing position and you defend your position. it's pretty simple.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
mods are the head of the community here, so it's only natural one of them should participate.
[–] XVktm [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
I find it highly ironic/comic that you should bring congeniality into this. Have you read some of the posts around here? Did I offend you sense of decorum?