You have decided to label me in a disingenuous way that is limiting this argument and make it quite not worth having. You've really made some extrapolations here that are unwarranted and not worth going down this rabbit hole with you any more.
So whatever. You win I guess, I'm not interested in continuing this any more.
[–] Sev_ 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Figured as much. You new kids are funny. You'll spend half you're day calling people "Nigger" and "Faggot" but get butthurt when someone implies that you have totalitarian tendencies. God forbid you actually back up any of your talk with a coherent argument. It's like being back on Reddit again.
You claim that the argument was limited, but you spent all of your replies ignoring the actual topic, trying to twist it into some kind of "pot should be legal and everyone who doesn't agree with me is wrong" argument when the fact that this isn't some government entity denying human rights, this wasn't about legal vs illegal drugs, and nobody was suppressing opinions (except of course, everyone who downvoated content they disagreed with), and this certainly wasn't about offhanded religious arguments. You see a "rabbit hole" when all that's really there is a simple premise you refuse to acknowledge.
This was about one dudes personal choice to violate an agreement he freely made, how it had consequences and how people like you are trying to convince everyone that somehow those consequences are unfair and deserving of sympathy. You advocate for this individual, but what you advocate for is throwing into the garbage personal integrity and honor when it becomes inconvenient.
[–] IfIDidIt ago
Why is "I'm not interested in talking to you any more" a cue to continue something I'm not interested in engaging with you any longer?