[–] insurgentsoul 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Reading through all the Twitter replies and shit, he gives 'confirmation bias' as an answer to fucking everything. Confirmation bias can be thrown around in so many cases. While I understand what he's saying, that doesn't automatically disprove or debunk pizzagate. I'm not sure what he's suggesting, but he's acting as if WE'RE committing a crime by researching and investigating. He seems oddly butthurt. And I agree with many others that the McMartin case is not a compelling comparison. These are two completely different cases. And, like TreyGowdy said, the McMartin case he mentions relies in eye witness testimony-- none of which is involved in pizzagate at all, so far.
I see Scott Adams' point, but he can't just spit the words 'confirmation bias' to try to derail us and make himself feel superior. Sorry, it's going to take a lot more than that.
[–] sentryseven 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've heard this guy. He's actually not that smart. He's quite naive about the state of things. For instance he calls Obama one of the greatest presidents of all time. He also said Trump offered zero issues on the campaign trail. If it is confirmation bias, it's only occurring because hundreds of coincidences and connections are occurring over and over and over again. The guy would make for a terrible investigator. He's smoked too much weed.
[–] youhavetogoback123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Wouldn't trust that man as far as I could throw him Look at that face. Looks like Epstein. Go away concern troll, who are you covering for.... You may be one of them for all we know.
[–] youhavetogoback123 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Is he running interference. Maybe. Don't judge a book by his cover. This story is too big. If you don't have anything positive to ad to the investigation then don't say anything at all. No idea who this guy is, his background, I don't care. This issue is too big. Keep digging lads. They're paranoid. Alafantis was on NPR the other day on his heels. Don't kid yourselves, these people know they are being watched. Comet PingPong doesn't even answer their phone anymore.
[–] MeatballPizza ago
We don't know what happened at this point. We have lots of smoke. Is there fire? We shall see.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
He's just plain wrong. Confirmation bias regarding individual leads is certainly a trap some investigators have been falling into, but the case as a whole rests on strong evidence. Alefantis commenting "chickenlovers" on a photo of his friend holding his one-year-old son can't reasonably be interpreted in any way other than the widely used pedophile slang. Same with all the references surrounding Heavy Breathing and their videos, and the graffitti in Comet, the instagram posts, the logos, etc. It's just far too much smoke for there not to be a fire.