1
1

[–] L2_Revolve 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I'm saying the blind leading the blind usually ends up off a cliff.

Fair enough. I think the blind leading the blind can work out if one of them have a sense of direction.

I'm not interested in discussing every known dilemma.

I'm not trying to discuss individual cases but to see if your principles can be applied to anything or if you have individual principles for individual cases. Which it seems.

And why are there so many pedo-apologists here!?

Where have I defended pedophiles? I haven't yet, but I'm going to right here - just to oblige you.

I'm OK with pedophiles in the same way a lot of christians are OK with non-practicing homosexuals.

Pedo- and hebophilia are sexual attractions. Sexual abuse is a criminal act.

I can't really feel anger towards a celibate pedophile and recidivism... How can you demand that someone who did nothing stop abusing?

People who sexually abuse the weakest in society on the basis of sexual desire have shown that they're not able to control their urges, and in light of this being a mental illness (which I've understood we can't really "cure") then indefinite confinement or deactivation of the sexual hormonal system is in order.

Lock up or castrate child abusers. That pedo-apologetic enough for you?