[–] joethebob ago (edited ago)
Consumptive tax is not a flat tax system and isn't in the 'Fair and Flat tax plan' so I'm not sure which specific plan you are talking about. A consumptive tax does little to nothing for lower wage people because they are using the vast majority of their money on said consumption.
The entire concept of pay in your wallet is somewhat spurious as you still have to pay the taxes regardless. There is of course some additional room for juggling finances and potential for interest/investment. But realistically, we aren't talking about people with significant disposable income here. Leaving a wholly uncollected tax bill to the end of the year would doubtless increase the delinquency rate.
I'm all for a vastly simpler tax code, but knocking down a building for plans on a paper napkin don't cut it in my book.
[–] InnocentBystander ago
Actually, I think you're the one missing the point.
14% from a guy who only has $100 is a far bigger price to pay than the guy who has a million. One guy has to eat less, or walk to work to pay tax, the other will hardly notice.
A progressive tax allows the poor to keep more, which will lessen their burden on the rest of society. It makes up the shortfall by taxing wealthy, who can afford it, more.
[–] zambeezy ago
So because you can afford it, yet receive the same product, you should pay more?