[–] TheAtlantean 3 points 1 point 4 points (+4|-3) ago (edited ago)
Good job. Wouldn't go as far as saying it's absolutely debunked. Agree; as it stands, could be both.
Would lean toward your explanation as 1) not all gestures need to have occultist symbolism and 2) I hesitate to accept the blunt showcasing of occultist symbolism.
Again, as it stands, could be both.
[–] Spuddlebuns 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You can pretty much stay that about any and all of the "connective dots." A picture of a gay guy holding a baby with a yellow bead necklace around them both is nothing 'concrete.' But you look at the comment next to it, and you start to look at the picture just a bit differently. Then you find out that yellow bracelets have a pedo meaning...sure, it's a bracelet, not a necklace. Could be innocent...but the comment makes you wonder... The delight in which the comment, "killroom" is given when posted with certain pictures... No, not all things have a hidden meaning, but how many dots need to be connected? By pointing them all out, there is a better chance that even the most naive observer will stop and way, wait a minute...
[–] quantokitty 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Typical shill response. Do a search on Google and then find any ridiculous match and attach the motivation to that. Yeah, number 14 on an obscure list would be enough for him to draw on his hands. I notice Podesta obsessively talking about that subject in his emails almost -- NEVER!!!! It's just as plausible to think it has to do with the well-known symbol used in Satanism. http://www.nazarite.net/satanic-symbols.html
Such a stupid post. Just stupid. Especially with the bandage on his middle finger.
[–] king_nothing_ [S] 3 points 3 points 6 points (+6|-3) ago (edited ago)
Uh, the email that the picture was attached to is literally titled "TWEETS: #GlobalGoals", and it says "#GlobalGoals" again in the body of the email, immediately followed by "No. 14". Did you even read my post and follow the links I provided? All I meant when I mentioned "Googling" was that I was looking for the official website for this "GlobalGoals" thing that was mentioned in the email, and I found it after Googling "GlobalGoals" and following the link of the top result (globalgoals.org).
[–] drbrontosaurus ago
Just looking into the link you posted: "The Nazarite Site was built to bring believers to the truth by exposing the twisted man-made doctrines of modern-day Churchianity known as the Great Apostasy in Scripture. Many people, including myself have fallen victim to these false doctrines taught by the Christian Churches. The Sunday observant Christian Churches practice and teach doctrines that are not Scriptural and in most cases are deeply rooted in pagan traditions, especially that which originated in pagan sun-worship."
Something about the way this reads doesn't make we want to trust them as an authority on anything, let alone occult symbolism. There has to be someone from the church of Satan or Crowley-ism or whatever they call it that could act as competent authority on these symbols, instead of trying to convince people with wackadoo protestant sect websites.
[–] enkisbeard ago
There is, but for the most part they are all staying FAR from this shit because it reminds them of the SRA scare of teh 80s where innocent pagans went down for the elites actions.
[–] sindakit 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
"My favorite of the #GlobalGoals" - This shows it has a significence to him.
Could it be that the people behind the list placed that particular goal at number 14 due to it's occult meaning? Hiding in plain sight is the MO of these people. You might not believe it but they give credence to numerology and symbolism which would dictate their actions.
Agreed though, it's nothing provable or worth making wild claims over so best looking for hard evidence but keep this all in mind as you go.
[–] Spuddlebuns 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
No one is making "wild claims" about ANY of this. BUT, the occult backgrounds of some of the symbolism, combined with the "art" being bandied about in plain sight IS being noted and documented as one more dot to connect in the situation. Murderers have been convicted of 1st degree murder with NOTHING but circumstantial evidence. But there has to be ENOUGH circumstantial "dots" to connect to make the picture clear to even the most ardent defenders... That is all this mountain of evidence is attempting to do. No one thing in and of itself can be taken as "concrete" proof. But we are talking, at this point probably close to a hundred or more separate little "dots" to connect...All patently visible to those who are willing to look past a cursory glance...
[–] wannabe101 ago (edited ago)
exactly, and I have to wonder why the dots don't connect to make a picture of something benign and NOT a cache of child abusing pieces of SHIT. sure the dots could just happen to seem to imply it but the odds of there being so many concurring dots are most likely slim. also the immediate response fromny times and msm to squash this to could be demonstrative of it being factual. also wanna add that reading alifantes statements in regard to the more seemingly innocuous pics of what he says are employees children I noticed he omitted mention of some of the more damning imagery like for one that image of whomever laying on the floor in drag covered in blood in what looks like comet pizza, the game machines or whatever behind him. yah, lemme post pix of myself soaked in blood laying on floor on my twitter and then cry how I run a family oriented pizza biz and wonder why everyones accusing me of bein a twisted fuck.
[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
John Podesta was displaying his latest achievement. He had participated in his 14th child sacrifice. He killed 14 "fish". And he was proud of it. Those satanists call children fish after they're done. They call them fish when they've killed them.
They call them Cheese Pizza when they're merely fucking them. This shit is endemic among politicians.
[–] wannabe101 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
justa tangent but recall in that old flik Caligula, caligulas father (ped) the emperor had naked children in his pool who 'kissed ' his legs underwater whom the emperor referred to as ' little fishes"
[–] TheAnswerIsC 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Interesting. I thought the fish and the 14 was code for 'fishing for teens" (fish = fishing/fourteen = for teen), but yours makes more sense.
[–] ArchCovenant 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Who writes such a thing on their hands? Why not hold a simple card or home made sign? Suspicious anyway you slice it. Wouldn't have titled this debunked?
[–] GrislyAddams 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
If read left to right, or backwards, it could say, "fish 14". Fish for teen. Perhaps it's not even an intentional thing. Sometimes our subconscious outs us. He could have picked any other thing on the list and not given out this message.
[–] Cradliving 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It is well known that those that are part of occult organizations have layers of disseminated meanings to their symbology, even within their ranks and especially to the uninitiated.
[–] OldShepThePirate 4 points 0 points 4 points (+4|-4) ago
Not hateful, provides source. Good post 'Gater, thank you.
Could be plausible denialibility for Pedosta, as it is plausible.