[–] quantokitty 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
The other part of this that's "fishy" is that something this stupid already arrives on the "HOT" listing? Why? Some other posts with more info do not have this many immediate views. It means you come with a shill entourage that bump up one another's shill posts.
[–] quantokitty 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Typical shill response. Do a search on Google and then find any ridiculous match and attach the motivation to that. Yeah, number 14 on an obscure list would be enough for him to draw on his hands. I notice Podesta obsessively talking about that subject in his emails almost -- NEVER!!!! It's just as plausible to think it has to do with the well-known symbol used in Satanism. http://www.nazarite.net/satanic-symbols.html
Such a stupid post. Just stupid. Especially with the bandage on his middle finger.
[–] drbrontosaurus ago
Just looking into the link you posted: "The Nazarite Site was built to bring believers to the truth by exposing the twisted man-made doctrines of modern-day Churchianity known as the Great Apostasy in Scripture. Many people, including myself have fallen victim to these false doctrines taught by the Christian Churches. The Sunday observant Christian Churches practice and teach doctrines that are not Scriptural and in most cases are deeply rooted in pagan traditions, especially that which originated in pagan sun-worship."
Something about the way this reads doesn't make we want to trust them as an authority on anything, let alone occult symbolism. There has to be someone from the church of Satan or Crowley-ism or whatever they call it that could act as competent authority on these symbols, instead of trying to convince people with wackadoo protestant sect websites.
[–] enkisbeard ago
There is, but for the most part they are all staying FAR from this shit because it reminds them of the SRA scare of teh 80s where innocent pagans went down for the elites actions.
[–] king_nothing_ [S] 3 points 3 points 6 points (+6|-3) ago (edited ago)
Uh, the email that the picture was attached to is literally titled "TWEETS: #GlobalGoals", and it says "#GlobalGoals" again in the body of the email, immediately followed by "No. 14". Did you even read my post and follow the links I provided? All I meant when I mentioned "Googling" was that I was looking for the official website for this "GlobalGoals" thing that was mentioned in the email, and I found it after Googling "GlobalGoals" and following the link of the top result (globalgoals.org).
[–] [deleted] 3 points 63 points 66 points (+66|-3) ago
[–] piratse 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
There is a LOT of stuff that is benign that people are assigning "pizza" stuff to. Remember kids: code words and code symbols are by designed supposed to look like normal words and symbols. That's the point. You HAVE to look at context. A fish could be a code in the right context, but 99% of the time it's just a fish. EVEN IF pizzagate is real, they won't be talking about it/showing off 99% of the time. More like 1% of the time. IF they do this stuff, it's normal to them, so they won't be discussing it all the time. How often do you talk to people about/flaunt that normal thing you do all the time? For a pedo that fucks kids, it's just another day of fucking kids, YOU GUYS are the ones that this is new/a shock to. Remember that.
[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
I agree with most of what you have to say. However, I've filtered my own emails at work. 44,000 of them over the past 10 years. I like pizza for lunch. I've sent emails to co-workers about lunch. I mentioned "pizza" one time in 10 years. These motherfuckers talk about "pizza" in a different way. It's obvious.
[–] EmmetMcTaggart 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hijacking the top post to show you his tweet with that picture.
https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/647493788869365762
https://tweetsave.com/johnpodesta/status/647493788869365762
I thought people knew about this.
[–] technetium82 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
I see what you did there....FISHY as hell :)
[–] TheAtlantean 3 points 1 point 4 points (+4|-3) ago (edited ago)
Good job. Wouldn't go as far as saying it's absolutely debunked. Agree; as it stands, could be both.
Would lean toward your explanation as 1) not all gestures need to have occultist symbolism and 2) I hesitate to accept the blunt showcasing of occultist symbolism.
Again, as it stands, could be both.
[–] Spuddlebuns 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You can pretty much stay that about any and all of the "connective dots." A picture of a gay guy holding a baby with a yellow bead necklace around them both is nothing 'concrete.' But you look at the comment next to it, and you start to look at the picture just a bit differently. Then you find out that yellow bracelets have a pedo meaning...sure, it's a bracelet, not a necklace. Could be innocent...but the comment makes you wonder... The delight in which the comment, "killroom" is given when posted with certain pictures... No, not all things have a hidden meaning, but how many dots need to be connected? By pointing them all out, there is a better chance that even the most naive observer will stop and way, wait a minute...
[–] lesmith4187 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
good to know...if for no other reason then if they use that as a cover up too we are aware in advance