[–] wannabe101 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
sure of itself a pic of writing on a persons hands, even WITH the shit eating grin would be seen as indicating nothing but, when you throw alllll these other images, connections, odd sentence contexts etc. its not just a single pic of a guy wth writing on his hands, and shouldn't be judged as such
[–] ManWithTheUmbrella 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'll talk all day and night about the art in his office and in his home. We can even take note of his odd looking bruised hands. But the number and the fish, if tied to something real then we should all just not get distracted. If you have a narrative then your brain will find connections that aren't even necessarily there to make all evidence fall in line with said narrative, however, without anything concrete then redefining the meaning of something like this can be done with anything and therefore may the most creative shoe horning individual's story win the day. This subject is serious, if we all start resembling those youtubers who find 666 in every fuckn logo ever then it all just becomes some watered down foil hat nonsense.
[–] curiousjosh ago
well said. I like how he uses the fact he hasn't sent an image to global leaders as part of his argument.
[–] Prepper_Jack 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Ahh yes, speculation is absolutely pointless when investigating. Of course.
If anything is out of place here, and seems to be "discrediting" things it's you. I also note that you don't seem to have contributed to the "effort" at all.
[–] ManWithTheUmbrella ago
Well I made this account today, and have only spent 48 hours looking at all the evidence and to be honest with you, all the interesting stuff seems to be being recycled over and over again, and I thought this particular post did a good job at debunking this image which appears in almost all media of pizzagate. I am not just going to throw shit at a wall and hope it sticks. If critical thinking lacks in this community then I guess that my questioning is needed. Your comment seemed more like disinformation than anything else and I think its my responsibility to point that out. I am not out of place. Investigations depend on evidence not your BS opinion.
[–] wannabe101 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
claps hands slowly... an excellent and typical response to imply that these speculations arent rational nor being approached rationally, great attempt to discredit some great insights and speculations based on EVIDENCE supplied by comet pizza itself and its circle of friends , who, obviously are all too fucking blind to see that their threads/comments/interests/common imagery/interests are all appearing to imply an underlying pedo theme? those are some stupid fuck parents and employees who choose to associate themselves and their kids wth people/employers who delight in ped and twisted fuck imagery. damn think about it for a sec mr 'rational'. would you take yr kids to a place whose owner chooses to portray himself and his business this way?
[–] Prepper_Jack 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well, I've been on pizzagate from very early on (albeit under a different guise). I have, actually looked at most of the evidence. I have actually contributed to the investigation. Unlike you. We know these people often speak in code. We know they enjoy double meanings. We know they enjoy thinking they are smarter than everyone else. We KNOW Podesta is a freak. We KNOW he uses code words in his emails. We know he engages in occultism, and surrounds himself with people who do the same.
We aren't trying to prove any of this at all, as it's pretty firmly established at this point. If you missed any of that, this would indicate that either you haven't read much about the investigation at all, or are just here to shill. So, if you're actually interested in helping, go read a bit about it all, and maybe do some digging of your own. If not, then fuck off. My opinion on this is informed, unlike yours. Is it unlike him that he would smugly put out an occult reference under the guise of something else? Those in the know would say no. You have to pay attention to when occultists flash numbers and symbols.
The only question is whether or not it's important to the investigation. I would say no, as it offers us nothing in the way of new leads.