[–] BlackLivesMatter111 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In 1939, the Fourth Neutrality Act authorised the US to trade arms with belligerents provided that the countries paid in cash and collected them. In March 1941, Roosevelt moved further towards making the US the ‘arsenal of democracy’ with the Lend-Lease Act, which permitted the lending, leasing, selling, or bartering of arms, ammunition and food to “any country whose defence the President deems vital to the defence of the US.”
What he did was completely legal.
[–] 6874838? ago
Legal or not he was still a war profiteer. He made money off both sides just like the Rothschild's and whoever else.
[–] BlackLivesMatter111 [S] ago
Well, since you accused him of treason, I guess that changes things.
He had a product that was in high demand, he sold it to those who paid him for it. Just like Apple sells iPhones to terrorists who use them for nefarious purposes, Henry Ford was a businessman, not a war hawk. Hitler and other countries needed engines for all types of civilian and other vehicles. He sold them engines, not guns or gave them loans to buy munitions with interest.
Henry Ford's dealings were nothing like the Rothschilds.