0
5

[–] SpitsMonsters 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'm sorry, but when I first heard Van Jones say "whitelash" I immediately thought, "way to KEEP it all about race". Because literally Hitler has zero Latino support, or say Black support. There are solid examples of people of many backgrounds and nationalities that support Trump, why is that so fucking hard to understand. I've also found that most of these clueless shitheels didn't even READ the fucking wikileaks!! I mean COME ON! FFS!!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] SpitsMonsters 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

When you make race THE issue, it becomes THE issue. Whitelash is used to inject a black/white dichotomy into the conversation while simultaneously placing blame on whites, it's ridiculous to even think that way and not expect to be rebuffed.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] SpitsMonsters ago 

Well, the media won't be going anywhere soon. There credibility on the other hand is completely smashed. I think dealing with sexism and/or racism is fine IF it includes everyone, not some exclusive PC bullshit that let's mobs of people be manipulated on ideas alone. Facts and sources that can be verified with critical thought. We're pivoting away from the echo chamber that reinforced and secured it's established oligarchy.

0
7

[–] ketezer 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

"Whitelash" is just more race baiting. Trump won because blacks, hispanics and asians increased their votes to the Republican side since the last election.

0
0

[–] alalzia ago 

Whitelash by the same people who voted Obama in previous elections , sure .