[–] Proppa 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
In conjunction with things like this it makes you wonder how long video evidence will actually be considered reliable. Which is pretty nuts. Can you imagine a world where video and audio recordings are considered unreliable evidence because it's so easy to fake? Or where the government can convey things you did or said that never actually happened? I'm sure it's still a ways off but the thought is pretty mind blowing. And scary
[–] derram 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
https://archive.is/lr1a6 :
'In seconds, the Adobe tech had made Key say heâ\x80\x99d kissed his wife before his dog, then kissed Jordan, then kissed Jordan three times. '
'According to Adobe, after about 20 minutes of listening to a voice, users can make the voice say whatever they want just by typing it out. ', "But Adobe knows this can be used to make people say things they didn't say."
'When Adobe released photoshop in 1990, it dreamed of a world where movie studios and photo editors could do in minutes what once took hours. '
'Jin said Adobe developed the software to help podcasters and audio book editors. '
This has been an automated message.