0
4

[–] DropTheBombbb 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I played NMS for 80+ hours, being on the hype train, and after release, being sure that the problems were due to Sony pushing the release date. I was certain that all problems would be patched in just a few weeks.

I enjoyed 50-60 hours, did the rest, waiting in high hopes.

I fucking hate NMS.

So to answer your question, ABSOLUTELY.

0
1

[–] thrus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes, definitely! Most games are well done at the start as that is what all the reviewers see and what they show off at events so they take the time to be sure that that is well polished. Then the standard for the game starts to show up.

0
0

[–] RaiFighter ago 

If you're laughing at it. I MST3K'd my way through all of You Are Empty and Chicago Enforcer.

And let me tell you, Chicago Enforcer was awful.

0
0

[–] Fambida ago 

Absolutely. Just as I can enjoy watching a bad movie, just to marvel at its awfulness, so can I enjoy a bad game, just to bask in the devs incompetence.

I will admit, it'd have to be quite a masterpiece of shit to keep me enthralled by the crappiness of a game for 4 hours without just putting it down and not coming back. Goat Simulator is a decent candidate.

0
0

[–] profanion [S] ago 

But what if you first think the game is good until cracks begin to show?

0
0

[–] Fambida ago 

Ah, that'd be Civ 5 for me. It's not til later on that you realise what a fucking mess one unit per tile is, or how inferior the culture trees were compared to previous civ games governments/civics, or how they gimped the fuck out of wide civs to the point that war is pointless.

And yes, I enjoyed civ 5 at first, for more than 4 hours.