0
0

[–] ossan ago 

I want one of the masks from A Scanner Darkly. As others have said, we won't win this one. I sometimes really hate the way our world is going,

0
0

[–] sterlingmaloryarcher ago 

Amazon stock rises drastically...

0
0

[–] 9-11 ago 

they already do and have been for a while. ever notice how when a man hunt in underway they always find the 1/2 second video of him walking into a walmart 5 states away 3 weeks later and catch them? walmart and others keep a database of all camaras in all stores for years. feds just get access and plug their facial recognition program on it and let it crunch. they even randomly catch people at large sporting events this way.

0
0

[–] 329744? ago 

So much for shopping therapy.. lol jk the internet will still exist.

0
0

[–] randommook ago 

Honestly I don't see how this wouldn't go in favor of the retailers.

Retailers don't need your permission to put up cameras in their stores. They don't need your permission to look at the footage from those cameras and therefore they don't need your permission to run the camera footage through a facial recognition program. The footage from the cameras belongs to the company and thus the company does not need permission from anyone to look at that footage even if they are using a program to look at the footage.

0
1

[–] BunyipMoan 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hoodies and burqas when going through these stores. And someone will come up with a little device you wear around your neck that shoots light beams up around your face so people can see you just fine, but cameras have difficulty. It happened with car number plate technology, it will happen with face technology.