[–] RectalLeakage 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Of course they haven't, that would be honest.
Why won't they release the full videos without all the manipulative soundbite editing?
because that isn't how you communicate effectively.
you find your message, say it at the start and end of your communication, and fill the middle with supporting evidence.
god, it's like you think people have an attention span longer than about 15 seconds.
They don't.
[–] RectalLeakage ago
They should. I think it's because they want to grab attention, rather than bury you in information like wikileaks does.
[–] HeavyBeefCurtain 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
CNN can literally be eating shit and will proclaim to not be eating shit. Logic is circular for them.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] RoryBellowsLives 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Eloquently put...I really couldn't have said it better myself, I use arguments like this to explain to people why I don't watch CNN or touch the WaPo or NYT. People (otherwise intelligent people) think I'm crazy and a conspiracy theorist solely because they can't see the game being played out right in front of them. Because hey...why would they TV lie to them?
I also can't blame Blitzer too much either. You can parrot BS and tow the company line and make millions per year or speak your mind and threaten being replaced.
[–] Rebel_Media_FTW 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The statements in the videos don't need independent confirmation.
[–] ScottRockview ago
Oh, so NOW when it's something against Hillary and not Trump, they want confirmed authenticity on a recording. Yeah, no bias there at all. /s
[–] BentAxel 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
No one gives a fuck what you think, Wolf