[–] Kal 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
The mental gymnastics voaters have done from when we were saying the same thing about Bernie crowds vs Hillary's is fun to watch. Oh, NOW it matters? After the election is stolen is that going to matter more than having the primary stolen from Bernie somehow? You fucking tools.
[–] Adminstrater 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Polls in favour of Hillary will convince lazy and apathetic Hillary supporters not to bother to remember to vote, so I am not sure what the purpose of the liberal media pushing a hillary lead causes except momentary bragging rights.
[–] MONKEYBUSINESS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Google is shady as fuck when you search for this. Examples: Trump rally "empty" http://i.imgur.com/9gvX0Z2.png Trump rally "violent" http://i.imgur.com/5tok5a3.png Reality: http://i.imgur.com/z7WDpuN.jpg http://i.imgur.com/iXx3kbP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/0awoYQ0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/SEpLd52.jpg
[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
A friend of mine went to see if there really was a disparity. He visited both candidates party stops here in SD. The group for Trump was way bigger.
[–] Shoggoth 4 points -2 points 2 points (+2|-4) ago
While I hate to admit it, this reasoning is flawed. People who show up to rallies are generally the more fervent supporters. However, even people who are not fervent about a candidate (and hence don't attend rallies) can vote for that candidate. This is not to say that we aren't being lied to and that there is no fraud occurring, but crowd comparisons aren't necessarily an indication of it.
[–] truthhurts09 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
Thank you. As much as I hate Killary, face it the kind of people who support her are not the kind to show up at rallies. They are the lazy who just want the gibs or who just want to virtue signal their support for xyz online and the most effort they can make is to vote.