[–] [deleted] 3 points 8 points (+11|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] CervicalStrike 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Reminds me of the dead migrant kids they push so hard while censoring all the European children the migrant good boys rape and slaughter.

0
2

[–] selpai 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You can also live for a long time with "flesh eating" disease. There are a lot of factors that go into play.

0
2

[–] J_Darnley 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Do you mean "Number of infections of ... expected to rise", Ars?

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I figured the bacteria was gonna reanimate his body and kick off the zombie apocalypse.

But I'm still scrolling through the comment section to find my bot's archive and haven't read the article yet.

0
1

[–] MetalAegis 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Or you could eat smoked oysters, raw oysters are fucking gross anyways.

0
1

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Poor guy got funked up.

1
1

[–] derram 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

https://archive.is/DFaiw :

Horrific flesh-eating bacteria that killed man in four days expected to rise | Ars Technica

'The deadly bacteria, Vibrio vulnificus , had slipped into a small cut on his leg as he waded into the bay’s still, warm, and brackish waters—ideal breeding grounds for the bacteria. '

'Funk’s case is among the more severe examples of V. vulnificus infections—but it still could have been worse . '

'Vibrio infections are somewhat rare—about 80,000 in the US each year—but they’re on the rise. '

'V. vulnificus , the only flesh-eating vibrio, is extremely fast-growing and virulent, researchers note. '

'V. vulnificus wound infections, like Funk’s, carry about a 20 percent mortality. '

This has been an automated message.

1
0

[–] shittersfull 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Whoever titled this article did a terrible job. I thought this article was about flesh-eating bacteria somehow turned people into zombies, like it killed a guy then 4 days later that guy rose from the dead.

0
0

[–] 6647566? [S] ago 

Now that would be something wouldn't it?