0
0

[–] Owlchemy [S] ago 

0
1

[–] thrus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well if it is more efficient I can see the appeal but it would require stronger wings and systems to move them that would add more weight so it would take more fuel to go, the trick is to balance them.

0
2

[–] Disappointed 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

For commercial flights I prefer fixed wing. I'd rather pay the fuel tax than have another moving part that can fail while I'm in it.

0
2

[–] blackguard19 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

NASA = Never A Straight Answer

NASA = No Actual Scientists Allowed

http://www.ufointernationalproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A5-2.jpg