Ah, universal suffrage was responsible for all bad things that happened afterwards but none of the good things. Convenient!
As if voting somehow caused the technology boom of the private sector.
You CAN, however, blame Hillary's current chances squarely on the shoulders of women.
You've no interest in sources, no interest in rational discussion, no interest in historic facts. By your own words, you shouldn't have the right to vote.
Kek. I have plenty of interest in those things, but not with people like you, or subjects like police needing to be able to move other people out of harm's way.
I'm male. I produce more than I consume, which is the average for males, unlike females. If voting were based off of what you could give back, women would have no vote.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/roiw.12165/abstract
And if you can't read studies, or don't want to take that time, here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V6s92p42UM&feature=youtu.be
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Crensch ago
Their voting had nothing to do with the inventions of MEN in the private sector.
I'm not digging around for a source for this, either. Not only should it be self-evident due to the only people caring about what Trump says are the emotional-thinking, but also because the numbers indicate that it's true.
I talk rationally to people that don't need a truckload of redpills to even understand my position. You do.
I'm pretty sure you can find the rest in a google search, and yes, it does.
... Yes, that's what I said.
Maybe you should watch the video, since you're too stupid to interpret even an abstract.
Yeah, it really does.