0
23

[–] Fenrirwulf 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

From the article: "One of the moon-shot goals he’s set for Jigsaw is to end censorship within a decade, whether it comes in the form of politically motivated cyberattacks on opposition websites or government strangleholds on Internet service providers. And if that task isn’t daunting enough, Jigsaw is about to unleash Conversation AI on the murky challenge of harassment, where the only way to protect some of the web’s most repressed voices may be to selectively shut up others."

WTF, how can you completely contradict yourself in just two sentences?

0
18

[–] WhoFramedReaderRabit 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Because, SJWs don't think shutting people up who they disagree with, is censorship. They live by a different set of rules.

My guess is after Obama surrenders the internet Oct 1st shit going to go downhill really fast for the internet.

0
2

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's double think at it's finest.

0
0

[–] Jaegerjaques ago 

"Jigsaw will end all murders in a decade, by strapping all potential murderers into gruesome torture devices which may selectively cause death."

0
17

[–] derram 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

But what happened next was the kind of backlash that’s all too familiar to women, minorities, and anyone who has a strong opinion online.

So everyone.

And their solution is to censor only those who disagree with certain ideologies.

0
13

[–] Totenglocke 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

The headline is misleading, it's a war on anyone to the right of Stalin.

0
2

[–] HAESisalie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

To the right of Stalin? More like to the right of Obama and Hillary and not in compliance with the SJW echo chamber they seek.

0
3

[–] Jaegerjaques 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yeah, or in other words, anyone to the right of Stalin.

0
12

[–] batterist 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

"Trumps anti-semitic supporters" ..ok, stopped reading right there.

0
9

[–] fluffyunbound 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Notice how by her own admission the "female victim" here started attacking people in virulent personal terms first.

But she's angry that the people she flamed, flamed her back.

0
1

[–] downton-stabby 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Bully isn't used to people fighting back.

0
6

[–] JustTruthful 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Mega corporations control global information flow, information is filtered, people invent new meanings to words to fight AI.. sounds like a dystopia future.. present to me.

0
0

[–] Jaegerjaques ago 

Wonder how fast the game of catch between algorithms and those who value free speech will go. Wtihin 2 years, will we all speak some unrecognizable form of gibberish to elude big brother's watchful eye? Something like: "Muh woop didda muhfugga gib doob didda".

0
1

[–] 6391574? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nah, we will probably still talk normally. We will just be driven underground, to places like Tor(or more likely, its successor).

0
3

[–] 6392270? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

War on trolls is the wrong way to think about this. This isn't a war on trolls this is a war on peoples opinions that they happen to not agree with. A war on free thought, at it's very core.

0
2

[–] hunter3 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

But when I present her with the notion of Conversation AI as a solution, she hesitates. “People need to be able to talk in whatever register they talk,” she says. “Imagine what the Internet would be like if you couldn’t say ‘Donald Trump is a moron.’”

0
0

[–] Jaegerjaques ago 

Literally the only reason she isn't all over it is because she's afraid it'll also be applied to her because she's one hateful cunt.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)