0
0

[–] Bunnnnnnn ago 

This can't be real lol and fats say they have trouble finding things in their sizes... they're squeezing human sizes out!!

0
0

[–] thefisherman1961 ago 

Vanity sizing. They should get rid of XXS and XS and just label all of them two sizes larger.

0
0

[–] QuatroQuatro ago 

Not only are the proportions off, you know damn well that the sizing numbers are fudged all to hell.

0
0

[–] Carsandsarcasm ago 

Simply comfortable

In the sense that I would be swimming in a bed sheet?

0
1

[–] LochTessMunster 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't know girl sizes, but isn't 8 the cutoff for normal/big?

0
0

[–] ThirteenthZodiac ago 

My understanding is that, to translate these to men's sizes, you add 21 to the number.

Assuming that's right, according to this chart, I can apparently wear a women's small. Not really sure what to do with that information, but that doesn't seem right, considering that I'm a guy at 5' 8" and 150.

0
0

[–] Plavonica ago 

I was just thinking that a 34" on this scale would be monstrously huge. Wasn't thinking in girl sizes.

0
2

[–] vegetariancatlover 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Bring back the good ol days pre vanity sizing when things were made for humans, when a 6-8 was a fucking large...ugh. not a 14-16. This pains me.

0
4

[–] TunaAndCucumbers 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Hey, me too!

I mean, the xs would be a little snug, but then I'm a 5'10" dude who lifts.

0
5

[–] Kvnt 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

How is 6-8 "small"? LOL! The chart IS insane!

0
4

[–] bunnee 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Lol, I'm that size myself and I fucking chuckled when I saw that. If I'm "small", what size are the women smaller than me? Anorexic? /s

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)