0
2

[–] vegetariancatlover 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Bring back the good ol days pre vanity sizing when things were made for humans, when a 6-8 was a fucking large...ugh. not a 14-16. This pains me.

0
11

[–] theepilepticferret 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I would also be an X-small, because I normally wear a size 4, which is also vanity sized to hell and back. At 5'7" I shouldn't be an X-small in anything, yet my closet is filling up with more and more garments in this size

0
2

[–] hypercat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I am XS in anything made for renaissance faire garb as they cater to fatties. ANNNNDD I am 5'10". There are basically 3 skinny people who go to fairs, so all the garb they make is for the fatties. I have very limited options, BUT they do love to make custom shit and like using less material so I can get some deals.

0
1

[–] RawDogginOscarMeyers 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Same measurements, can confirm. I also bought a size 0-2 pair of pants a few weeks ago...they were work pants! No stretch fabric or anything either.

0
3

[–] WileyECryote 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

As a tiny human, if I saw this size chart I wouldn't even bother trying their cloths. Size 0 can be quite larger when it comes from a company that caters to fats (old navy). And then fatties get reeeee when companies introduce 000. Small people have NOT gotten smaller. Fats ruin everything.