Before I entered the IT world, I used to work in payment investigations for a credit card company. They can try to charge back the amount but in the end they usually write off amounts under $20-25 (sometimes even more) because it would cost them that much to get it back. Now, in a case like this they usually would try to get them back because it is the same entity doing it over and over and the total is a lot more than normal write-off amounts. There may be something going on in the background with state AG to put some pressure on someone.
Mind you, it's just an assumption... but these banks do support her after all. Sounds like a great way to skirt campaign finance laws and give their chosen candidate money.
Say they do try to get the money back. Money she already spent. After the election. Can't her campaign just declare bankruptcy at that point? What's the downside for them? Their job is already over...
[–] 6330015? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Before I entered the IT world, I used to work in payment investigations for a credit card company. They can try to charge back the amount but in the end they usually write off amounts under $20-25 (sometimes even more) because it would cost them that much to get it back. Now, in a case like this they usually would try to get them back because it is the same entity doing it over and over and the total is a lot more than normal write-off amounts. There may be something going on in the background with state AG to put some pressure on someone.