[–] Quaestorr ago (edited ago)
Would you take an Amish person seriously (i.e. as someone sensible to have a converstaion with) if he would still take his religion seriously. I wouldn't. I couldn't, even if would desire it.
A 'living god' that is either the ethno-god of some other people, or, allegedly, of all mankind, will at some point lead the flock into multi-ethnicism again, as he has done before. There is no force in Europe, not even the combined socialist parties, that managed to get in so many non-whites, as the various christian churches, through promoting adoption of African babies and sheltering refugees etc.
And what is this 'living' quality of Christ or YHWH other than some cultivated psychotic responses? If we need such hallucinating, atavistic urges, we might as well condition ourselves to get rid of the Hebrew jargon.
I recognize the problems with that: at least the Judeo-Christian tradition has been with us for centuries, and is ingrained into our collective psyche. But some traditional elements (i.e. the Christmas tree) are heathen is essence anyway. Shouldn't we stick to emphasizing these elements, and start working to slowly transform from christened-Europids, to indigenous-spiritual Europids?
[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'm mostly approaching this from a 'what works' perspective. The Amish or even the FLDS have real cultures based on sincere belief. I've witnessed them personally. And they are impressive after a fashion because they are real and withstood the test of time and even tribulation.
[–] Quaestorr 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is al true. But personally, I'd only be able to see them as real persons if they'd confess to me, even if only in private, a whisper in my ear maybe: "I don't literally believe, but I appreciate all that in an allegorical way". Until that, I mainly see them as well-functioning depositories of Europid genetics.