[–] frankenmine [S] ago
No, he's never said his stories hold up because they're Pulitzer-worthy. It's the exact reverse. They're Pulitzer-worthy because they hold up and represent difficult, courageous journalism.
Since you're outright lying now, there's no point to talking to you. Bye.
[–] WhatDaDuce ago
Lol you obviously don't understand the implication of using suggestive speech.
Since you don't understand, I'll use a hypothetical situation: If a Doctor makes a statement saying how eating pasta is immediately fatal and within the speech he references his award worthy studies. He brings up his "award worthy studies" to imply that he has credibility. No proof just implication.
Same thing this dude does. His articles that don't pan out (Read as: His articles that are nothing more than lies and weak speculation) are removed from his website.
He brings up good points but when he didn't have solid facts (Read as: making shit up) he likes to throw in his "Pulitzer worthy" bs statement.
My articles are Pulitzer worthy too, because I said so. Let me remind you that I have exactly the same amount of Pulitzers as the writer of this article.
But since you're just drinking the koolaid there is no point taking to you.