[–] lord_nougat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
She's a WAY better candidate than hillary.
Equating the energy source with the lowest death/kwh with the most dangerous weapons ever created, demonstrates at best willful ignorance. In a world where climate change is becoming more and more obvious, where a solar backbone has been elusive for over 50 years, hamstringing the real options we may one day need is recklessly irresponsible. Her ignorance could be cured in a mere hour consultation with legitimate experts.
[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Eh, as with many third party candidates you think they are pretty great at first then you read into their platforms and its so full of red flags and dealbreakers that you turn around and go back to voting for trump.
Open borders - no fucking thanks.
Likes iran nuclear deal - nope
Wants government funded political campaigns - useless
Pro gun control - fuck off old bitch
Accepting Syrian refugees - eat a dick
Pro blm - nope nope nope
[–] MetalAegis 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
As other people have stated, she is pro gun control, pro mass immigration, pro open boarders and pro BLM.
Maybe not a globalist puppet, but certainly a useful liberal fool.
[–] FuckReddit- 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Honestly the way i see it is trump is chaos, hillary is hilarious so i only have her to vote for, she is the only one that at least isnt nuts. She has my vote only because my boy bernie is out.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] AutisticInTech 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
She is pro every 'nice' and 'moral' thing.... Which is utter cluster fuck insanity if one considers the reality.
A public office like president of a major nation is living with trade offs from sunup till sundown. And most of the time none of the choices are nice or even remotely moral, they are trying to rationalize the best choice from a horrible cluster fuck of humanity and its consequences. Her need to stand on top of a moral soapbox is either just pandering, or dangerous niativity.
[–] OneNation 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
She's run for public office often, but never been elected, right? this is why people don't vote for her
[–] hunter3 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
because she doesnt believe in zoos (at least for primates)?
[–] OneNation ago (edited ago)
She's good at tweeting, but substantive policy is not her strong suit. However, during this election, that doesn't kick her out of the realm of possibility. She's just a little off her rocker. First with the anti-vax stuff, then the wifi will kill you stuff, and now with the poor Harambe. She has Miss Havisham tendencies.