[–] [deleted] 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
5

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma [S] 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

There would be a sudden and sharp decline then. If you added getting rid of food stamps and free school lunches, the decline would drop even further. In fact a few might die in the process thus relieving us of already born children also. Then just to accelerate the decline further kids medicaid should be done away with to ensure the weakest die out before reproducible age. In addition abortions should be free, birth control free, condoms free, and births should be taxed heavily. That way no woman would want to go to the labor ward to have their child and you might garner quite a few more deaths that way too. Let's not forget to make sure to charge extra for childhood vaccinations too. Give special rights to gays with a certain quota (10 percent since they are ten percent of the population) reserved for just them at work. Give them preference in adoption, after all if kids think gay is normal less will be born because more will choose "alternative lifestyles".

If you are disgusted by this, please understand I wrote it to show the logical conclusion your statement could be brought to. Do not for a second think some of these things aren't being promoted for the very reason that they reduce population. Personally, I think less welfare might be a good thing, depending on the situation. I on't think kids should suffer that are already born though, so like taper off welfare with all sorts of warning ahead of time.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] KinkRaven 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You just summed up Critical Theory in a nutshell.

0
0

[–] derram ago 

https://archive.is/UWFTJ :

Climate-change activists call for tax policies to discourage childbirth - Washington Times

This has been an automated message.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 17 points (+21|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

0
13

[–] SenecaTheYounger 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

It's sad you are getting down votes for this. From the article itself:

Poor nations would be cut slack “because they’re still developing, and because their per capita emissions are a sliver of the developed world’s. Plus, it just doesn’t look good for rich, Western nations to tell people in poor ones not to have kids,” NPR said.

This is a roundabout way saying "Any nonwhite country won't be asked to do this"

0
5

[–] guinness2 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Agreed.

And stop giving aid to Africa because that only allows the niggers to breed... and no problem was ever solved by adding more niggers to it!

0
3

[–] KinkRaven 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Fuck these Marxist pieces of shit.

So basically China's one child policy but through tax penalties.

Jebus these people should be shot.

5
-4

0
0

[–] Norm85 ago 

The smart developing nations (I am only aware of one example, but I'll leave it as a plural) have already done this. Look at how the leftists treated them in the media.

0
8

[–] MetalAegis 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yeah sure, tax fertility rates from 1.5 kids per white family to 0...

0
1

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We have a surplus of children being raised in poverty. It would be easier to just remove supports for said kids. That way no one is taxed, which is bad...but less children would be around.

0
5

[–] Amateur_Wizard 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Climate change activists? Oh, George soros you mean?

1
1

[–] Totenglocke 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

There's an easy and fair way - stop giving people tax deductions for having kids and people who are married.

People taking responsibility for their choices is a terrifying concept!

0
1

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The only people that get tax deductions are the ones that work. Wouldn't you prefer we reduce children in the workless population? Reduce or get rid of welfare, free lunches, and medicaid. That would get rid of kids fast in the workless populations.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)