[–] aileron_ron 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Hay, Would you like to rent my beach house
[–] crazy_eyes 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The thing is the paid shills are really only on one side of the issues
[–] 6089916? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
There are the obvious, over-the-top shills, but they are just providing cover for the more sophisticated and predatory shills that work in packs to use more subtle manipulation. The shilling isn't simply paid advocates - they include psyop-level coordination. https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ (the stuff related to forums are in the last 25% of the article)
[–] Fambida 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Maybe you should just have more faith in the essential goodness of Correct The Record. I mean, they're not named "make shit up", they're CORRECTING falsehoods spread about Mrs. Clinton. Hillary is a wonderful lady with no health problems, a keen mind, and the well-being of children, puppies, and every citizen near and dear to her heart. I can't wait for her to trounce that racist misogynist shitlord Drumpf in the debates. Further, she will help enact the TPP, which is the strongest most beneficial trade treaty the world has ever seen, and which has absolutely zero downsides.
Seriously though, the one thing I just don't get about shills is how they can do it without feeling dirty afterwards. Even typing that shit above for lols makes me feel sullied.
[–] SavePrivateRyne 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Probably because you don't get paid per post. If you are desperate for money it's probably a lot easier to say what you just did.
[–] UncontrollableSphere [S] ago
Gee, I never thought about it that way. I'm glad that honest, genuine people are still around on Voat, and alway will be, forever on end.
[–] SavePrivateRyne 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
I don't know if you've watched House of Cards but the writers for that show much have some incredibly accurate information. Like, this last season talked a decent amount about manipulating search algorithms on the most popular search website and how it could basically assure a solid victory.
Then I start seeing articles pop up about Google's CEO investing tons of money into the Clinton Campaign. Then I see videos essentially proving that Google is manipulating is search in Clinton's favor.
That is so worrisome to me because who can we ever trust?
[–] schwanstucker 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That is sad, but you're learning. In a sense, this was really quite predictable. the MSM got into the fray early on by heaping contempt on the "bloggers," who, they said, "don't have any credentials." And now, in the vein of "black lives matter," we find, "credentials don't matter," and "reporting is dead," and "editorializing is reporting," and so on. I wouldn't be too surprised to find that someone has developed a means of disinformation (not your word, but the correct one) that is completely automated, and posts BS every hour. I think in these days we must keep our own counsel, think with care, and be honest ourselves. That's hard to do when the opposing forces are so dishonest, and when (for example, Clinton) someone castigates their opponent for doing exactly what THEY are doing. It takes some effort to filter all this stuff out. I just hope that the mainstream of the American people (indeed, all people) DO take the time to think things through...
[–] UncontrollableSphere [S] ago
I don't think they've created a disinformation bot yet. Bots that autopost articles? Bots that autoflag negative articles? Bots that autoupvote / downvote posts? Probably.
I'm sure they have scripts that can mash-up talking points with a few clicks, but they still need human operators to make sure the sentence makes sense. But one day, bot AI will get so good that it'll blend in with the other trolls. And then real people will be outnumbered by shillbots in every online community.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
[–] UncontrollableSphere [S] ago
But, for a while at least, the internet was relatively free of them. Of course they were around, but never in sufficient numbers to control the narrative of some of the largest forums for discussion online.
[–] culofiesta 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
When I read something I find sketchy or suspicious my first thought is what would other people gain by having me believe this.
See the HAES movement and how they want everyone to lower their expectations so life will be easier for them.
Whenever someone tells me something I disagree with I put myself in their shoes and figure out how their lives would be better if I believed it.
It opens your eyes man, like whoa dude
[–] RedViiper 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Not a shill here, but would you like to buy some dick pills?