[–] mamwad 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
It's completely feasible to enforce borders. We have the technology to travel, and also the technology to limit immigration. But you act like it's impossible to go to a national socialist state for tourism. Of course you can visit.
That's not what I'm saying at all. It's not just about tourism. It's about relationships, business, education. Generally, it's about free association. National socialism is a hindrance to the natural and free association between individuals connecting with each other through the mediums that exist today. National socialists, for instance, believe in state controlled media. The 23rd point in the document linked to above necessitate a nationwide firewall that prevents any "unapproved" foreign materials from being disseminated to the members of the United States. National socialism isn't just about keeping the borders closed, it's about isolating the entire public from the world outside of the nation state. Not only is that a violation of human rights, it's unsustainable as a national policy. (This is consistent with how the Third Reich operated, too).
The third reich was very passionate about protecting the environment.
Yet, it's a global problem that requires all producing nations to be on board to solve. Nations need to cooperate, and the people need to be able to hold all nations accountable for their actions in order to preserve the global environment.
[–] hamans_revenge ago
So as a hardline globalist, you think the state europe is in is currently fine?
[–] mamwad ago
No, Europe is a victim of neoliberalism just like most of the world is. It's an oligarchy. I advocate for democracy.