[–] jackofdiamonds 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago
I love how they claim "lower living standards" will be the result of nationalism. Yeah, for the wealthy corporate donor class. For workers, protection from cheap competition will absolutely, without question raise wages and shrink the gap between the 99% and the 1% liberals are always complaining about. Funny how that issue doesn't seem to matter to them this season.
[–] Soundguy21 0 points 21 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago
what a propaganda piece, globalism (aka being ruled by oligarchs) is not all happiness and rainbows, in fact for most of us would suffer.
[–] misaeldodsonQbt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If it had been propaganda in favor of nationalism, you probably wouldn't have said anything. Nice double standards.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
[–] the_spectre 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
"Globalist" is such a generic word.
But I suppose we can't just speak the name of the problem.
[–] KosherHiveKicker 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago (edited ago)
SHillary Clinton is in lockstep with ((( "The Globalist" ))) of the United Nations seeking to end nation-states and take over....
AND
AND