1
28

[–] Capt_Rye 1 point 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

"Should we go after the company and owner that probably owe us billions? Na let's go after the poor schmuck that works 3 jobs for being 5k off on his last tax return" ~IRS

0
8

[–] foobar444 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Of course... it's easier to harass someone without a legal department.

0
6

[–] Capt_Rye 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

And that's why we should base their success and budgets off of amount of income collected from tax evaders and not on number of tax evaders caught e.g. seizing 1.5 billion from 1 person or comany rather than seizing 45 million in assets from 65000 people .

0
3

[–] ratsmack 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I think Zuck would look good in handcuffs.

0
1

[–] thatguyiam 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

More specifically, these

0
1

[–] MCVoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

kinky

[–] [deleted] 0 points 48 points (+48|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] BANGAndTheDirtIsGone 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Checkmate, motherfucker.

0
3

[–] EngelbertHumperdinck 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That hardly makes up for all the privacy stuff.

0
2

[–] Avnomke 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well, it means the IRS might shut Facebook down.

0
0

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma ago 

We can only hope.