[–] Kookus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's fine. You realize that still allows for prosecution of females for raping a male by involuntary penetration of the vagina, right? It actually says that the law was changed specifically to address the problem of lack of coverage for male victims:
Many agencies interpreted this definition as excluding ... rapes of males.
And yes, legal definitions and the discussions thereof are pedantic by nature. You might have thought about that before starting the discussion, and then, after backing out, doubling down with a separate definition that only further proves my point.
[–] Artofchoke ago
Holy shit, I'm not doubling down, I think rape is a penatrative act, you don't, nothing has changed. Where are you getting female on male rape from that? I'm getting male on male rape from that. Due to the incarceration system, it's entirely possible more males are raped in America than females. By other men.
[–] Kookus ago
I never said that. Nor did I at any point suggest that you aren't entitled to your own opinion on what is and isn't acceptable. The one, single point that I am arguing is thus:
A point you made in response to a picture posted by /u/derram, in which, judging by your subsequent posts on the topic, you presumably take issue with the implication that "unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman" constitutes rape.