0
1

[–] Laserchalk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you have relaxed gun laws then you also run the risk of the guns getting into the hands of people that want to do harm. There is a middle ground where you have strict gun laws that require training, registration and bans on certain types of weapons. That way you can help prevent guns getting into the wrong hands and also give good people access to self defence. I've noticed that a lot of Americans don't like that though since they think they need guns to wage war with their government.

0
1

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You know in America there are about 300 million guns. One for every man, woman, and child. I have a few myself. Funny thing, where gun laws are most stringent, there are more homicides. Where they are most relaxed there are fewer homicides. In Texas, two ISIS sacks of shit tried to shoot people and were gifted with a free trip to the afterlife with in minutes. You didn't see 84 dead or some crap. In fact, the ONLY place in America where people get shot in large numbers is gun free zones or in very strict gun control zones.

In Europe where gun control is very stringent, you see people being mass raped and murdered DAILY. I mean, I know you are civilized, but are you so domesticated that you can not see that in ten years you will be no more civilized than jackals with all of these jihadis running around. Who will be left to tout how civilized you are once they are through with you? Unless you can mount a resistance to these terrorists, you will all die and the terrorists will conquer the land of your birth. You will have no native populations left. Germany will become Jihadistan. All the blond women traded like sexual baseball cards to different Muslim jihadi soldiers. Is that what civilized people do? Give up?

Are you that afraid of your fellow native Germans that they should not have guns? Would you feel safer if native Germans had guns to protect themselves from the invaders? It has NOTHING to do with waging war with your government, though at this point it might since Merkle wants you to be over run with these bastards, and everything to do with preserving your life. So go ahead and snub your nose. I will laugh as Europe burns knowing my children and their children are safe because we are free to defend ourselves properly from this smut you call refugees.

2
-1

[–] Laserchalk 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

I'm not from Europe, I'm from Australia. If you haven't noticed, the gun free zones in America are only designated as gun free zones because there was a high rate of gun violence to begin with.

Introducing gun free zones in a country where you can easily get guns by crossing a state border is moronic. You can travel to another state, purchase a gun with very little security checks and then legally sell your gun to a criminal. Your gun laws allow guns to easily spread throughout gangs and a lot of it is legal. It's not a crime for an individual to sell guns to a criminal in America which is stupid.

If you had strict gun control you could make sure only good guys have guns and all it would take is a little bit of common sense. You could have a requirement for all gun owners to have the proper training which would reduce accidental gun injuries and deaths.

You could make it compulsory to have guns registered, this would help keep track of guns. So if the police find someone with a gun and no gun license then they can receive jail time. You could also make it so gun owners have to re-register their guns every few years so you can prevent people from selling guns to others.

You could also ban automatic weapons that are only a tool for killing others. Most people only need a handgun for self defence. If a killer gets their hands on an automatic weapon then your civilians will most likely only have a handgun on hand to protect themselves. So it doesn't make sense to give the killer such an advantage.

All of these common sense laws could easily help prevent gun deaths but for some reason, people in America seem to think it is the greatest idea to have extremely relaxed gun laws.

3
-3

[–] IdSay 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

why would a civilian need a gun?

you can't shoot police to defend yourself, you'd either die or get thrown in prison for life.

you can't shoot a criminal breaking in, even if it's self defence, you'll get killed or thrown in jail. (taking another persons life is as wrong as death sentence, it's irreversible, fast, and very error prone)

the only people that would get the advantage of easier gun access would be the mafia.

gun laws are like traffic lights, it discourages sleazebags from breaking the law, because they fear the punishment.

1
1

[–] EarlPoncho 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

you are literally retarded

1
0

[–] Voat_a_Goat_Mamma 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

you can't shoot a criminal breaking in, even if it's self defence, you'll get killed or thrown in jail.

Self defence is a god given right that can neither be taken nor created.

Also you can shoot your dinner...we do here in Arkansas. I'm pretty sure you have no clue about these things though and I don't have the paitience how to teach you to be a free person. Enjoy your self made chains.