[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
[–] oedipusaurus_rex 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
If we did that, then there would be no US government.
[–] gregorypeckerwood ago (edited ago)
The victims at the Bataclan were tortured, disemboweled, raped with knives, had their genitalia cut off and shoved in their mouths, had their eyes gouged out...
[–] KingMortales ago
Why would we care about being doused in pig's blood? There's no retaliation for this, at least not in an exact way.
[–] ChairmanPao 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Could cutting up the corpses of terrorists and feeding them to pigs act as a deterrent?
I think the success of this as a deterrent is almost entirely dependent on the percentage of terrorists who have seen this scene from Snatch. If we could sufficiently increase Brick Top's exposure to the fundamentalists then I predict a 90% reduction in domestic terror attacks within 2 - 5 years.
[–] ButtPlumber 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There's a company making pork-tipped bullets. They call it jihawg ammunition I think.
[–] elgindelta 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Thats what the US Marines did. If it works for them it works for me
[–] 5829003? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'd like it to happen just to see the moderate muslim rethoric.
If they're not muslims, who gives a fuck. Remember these are the guys who simply took people to a shore and started using 1 bullet then kicked them off to the sea/river/lake.
Or boko haram, who dug giant graves and kept slicing necks off and kicking them into the grave.
ISIS literally tried every fantasy in a sadist book. There's no reason for anyone to defend that the remainings of a deceased terrorist should be honored. Muslims themselves say: "they're not muslims". In other words, since the MUSLIM world says they're not muslims (although many believe them to be and sympathize), there's no reason why they shouldn't inflict the worst treatment for a muslim. And I don't mean being eaten by pigs. I'd just bury them with pigs.
[–] mamwad 2 points 21 points 23 points (+23|-2) ago
Desecrating corpses is just as likely to fuel increased resistance as it is to deter it. Plus, I thought we were fighting barbarism, not engaging in it.
[–] nomenimion 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
This is also what I thought.
[–] Dysprosium ago
And myself.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
[–] mamwad 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Nah, I was being sardonic and rhetorical.
[–] gosso920 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_James_Napier#Service_in_India
A story for which Napier is often noted involved Hindu priests complaining to him about the prohibition of Sati by British authorities. This was the custom of burning a widow alive on the funeral pyre of her husband. As first recounted by his brother William, he replied:
Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.
[–] DickHertz ago
Barbarism applies to how you treat people when they are alive not to the method of disposing the dead bodies so much.