[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] gregorypeckerwood ago  (edited ago)

The victims at the Bataclan were tortured, disemboweled, raped with knives, had their genitalia cut off and shoved in their mouths, had their eyes gouged out...

0
5

[–] oedipusaurus_rex 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

If we did that, then there would be no US government.

0
0

[–] KingMortales ago 

Why would we care about being doused in pig's blood? There's no retaliation for this, at least not in an exact way.

0
0

[–] Monsantos_Schlong ago 

More like being doused in raped white girls blood.

0
0

[–] nomenimion ago 

No.

2
-1

[–] 8_billion_eaters 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Yes, it would. However, like u/mamwad says, we're supposed to be fighting barbarism...

What should be done is to arrest every member of the terrorist's family and charge them with sedition and conspiracy. Arrest every phone contact (if available) and do the same. Shut down the mosque(s) that any of them attended for a thorough criminal investigation. Do this a few times and they'll stop. ...maybe.

0
0

[–] Bindlestiff [S] ago 

corpses don't have rights. people do. arresting people without due process is barbarism. feeding animals isn't.

2
-2

[–] gazillions 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

I count terrorist mutilation & torture of their victims as barbaric. Every terroristis killing is barbaric as far as I'm concerned. I don't count arrests of suspects as barbaric or arrest and sentencing without due process as barbaric. I consider it logical and proper defense. I don't consider it a game of rights either. It's life and death.

0
1

[–] SeanBox 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

... Sooo... All of them?

0
0

[–] 8_billion_eaters ago 

Well, you know....not the pizza guy, but contacts that even have the appearance of suspicion.

...and put the kids with CPS.

2
21

[–] mamwad 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

Desecrating corpses is just as likely to fuel increased resistance as it is to deter it. Plus, I thought we were fighting barbarism, not engaging in it.

0
0

[–] DickHertz ago 

Barbarism applies to how you treat people when they are alive not to the method of disposing the dead bodies so much.

0
1

[–] gosso920 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_James_Napier#Service_in_India

A story for which Napier is often noted involved Hindu priests complaining to him about the prohibition of Sati by British authorities. This was the custom of burning a widow alive on the funeral pyre of her husband. As first recounted by his brother William, he replied:

Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.

1
0

[–] AntiCucks_dotcom2 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Anything you do as a westerner is likely to fuel more jihad, just convert and be done with it.

0
0

[–] tccl ago 

a corpse is a corpse

2 replies

1
2

[–] elgindelta 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Thats what the US Marines did. If it works for them it works for me

2
2

[–] gramman74 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Couldn't hurt