0
0

[–] WhiteRonin ago 

Those sites probably haven't updated their front end in the past 3 years.

I can't really think of a reason why a site has to be mobile only ... Is like never. There are times when you have tables with lots of data columns but why are you on mobile?

Proper use of the media tag for CSS makes a huge difference.

0
0

[–] twentyfive ago 

SOME ARE GOOD SOME SUCK BALLS

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin ago 

It's called bad UI design or the site owners give a shit to update to 3 year old habits. ;-)

0
0

[–] lxbb ago 

Totally get you, but I think this is part of the reason; http://searchengineland.com/library/google/google-mobile-friendly-update

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin ago 

Google is smart enough to take into account Twitters Bootstrap which offers the ability to go responsive ;-)

0
0

[–] Vailx [S] ago 

Well, having a mobile site and making it into a jail are two different things.

0
0

[–] 5780338? ago 

I also hate them; they are useless.

I actually use only Voat on my mobile phone only via IE, all others I avoid. The same for these crappy tablet sites, I don't even bother to go to them anymore.

0
5

[–] roojy000 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Are mobile sites really popular or something?

Web designer here. Tack on a mobile website, make an extra $1000.

They're popular to website buyers, not so much end-users.

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin ago 

Don't you do responsive design???

0
1

[–] Vailx [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This makes a lot of sense, thanks. Probably some PHBs think it's good for some reason.