0
1

[–] epsilona01 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If they're a socialist / greedy parasite, then you're right. If they were just supporting him because there was still an alternative to Hitlery on the D ticket, they might be willing to vote for someone on the other side who is also railing (well, still railing) against the corrupt establishment. (I know, i know.. but some people who were D didn't really know why, we need to open their eyes)

I'm just saying that we shouldn't try to antagonize them specifically, as more votes for Trump are good. But if they can't handle the truth about their former savior then that's tough shit.

2
1

[–] BoiseNTheHood 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

There were other alternatives to Hillary at the start of the race. Anyone who gravitated to Bernie over, say, Jim Webb was clearly intent on using the ballot box as their personal ATM and the election as their shopping spree.

0
0

[–] AverageAmerica ago 

Right... who would want to sway potential voters?

If you really cared about Trump and his anti establishment campaign, you wouldn't go out of the way to antagonize people who had tried to get their own anti establishment candidate across the isle.

1
0

[–] BoiseNTheHood 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Bernie isn't anti-establishment. Leftism is the establishment. And even if we pretend it isn't, he endorsed Hillary.