If they can show me a population who has no vaccs and are better off ,healthier , stronger then their argument would
at least have some validity. But they can't. Because they are wrong. It is that simple.
Gee, I guess the eradication of smallpox is even not enough to convince you of the benefits of vaccines. Take a good read of what that disease did to people. I pity you and all you teach your nonsense too.
I have no doubt that vaccines work.
I also have no doubt that vaccines can have unintended side effects. This could be from any number of factors, whether by design, improper storage, administration, screw ups, etc.
I personally eat as close to Paleo as possible, which means I very closely monitor what goes into my body.
The question is, should I by law be told what to inject into my bloodstream? Or my kids for that matter?
If the government was so obsessed with keeping my kids healthy, consumption of Coke would be illegal and so would half the shit at the grocery store.
I strongly feel that the only reason this is such a big issue is the pharma lobbyists pushing an agenda. Not health concerns
[–]green_man0 points
6 points
6 points
(+6|-0)
ago
They don't give a flying fuck about biohazards, if they did they wouldn't be pulling shit like this. This is probably closer to "You will comply for the sake of compliance" than anything else.
I too am a left-winger and therefore I too fully and wholeheartedly believe that anyone who believes [insert something I disagree with here] should have [insert description of some manner of the forceful interference with a peaceful human being here] and [insert some reference to little-understood foreign country that has been decimated by the intervention of western "democracies" but I conveniently blame their tragic destruction on the absence of a strong "democratic" regime here], particularly because they already [insert reference to something said by object of my scorn that makes my imagined punishment a deliciously and poetically just contrapasso here].
I understand the science behind vaccines and am grateful for them, but surely you can appreciate that there's an ethical violation behind forcing people to receive them.
[–] mirimar 3 points 1 point 4 points (+4|-3) ago
If they can show me a population who has no vaccs and are better off ,healthier , stronger then their argument would at least have some validity. But they can't. Because they are wrong. It is that simple.
[–] SomeoneOnTheInternet 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
You do know that no studies exist where they compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated for any meaningful amounts of time. I wonder why that is...
[–] mirimar 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
Gee, I guess the eradication of smallpox is even not enough to convince you of the benefits of vaccines. Take a good read of what that disease did to people. I pity you and all you teach your nonsense too.
[–] fr33europe 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
I think it's a bit more complex.
I have no doubt that vaccines work. I also have no doubt that vaccines can have unintended side effects. This could be from any number of factors, whether by design, improper storage, administration, screw ups, etc.
I personally eat as close to Paleo as possible, which means I very closely monitor what goes into my body.
The question is, should I by law be told what to inject into my bloodstream? Or my kids for that matter?
If the government was so obsessed with keeping my kids healthy, consumption of Coke would be illegal and so would half the shit at the grocery store.
I strongly feel that the only reason this is such a big issue is the pharma lobbyists pushing an agenda. Not health concerns