[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Hillary wants to take away your guns, ban them from sale in the USA and give them to those guys in exchange for donations to the clinton foundation?
We are going to bomb the shit out of them
[–] laikaislost 5 points 2 points 7 points (+7|-5) ago (edited ago)
I know I will get the shit downvoted out of me, but CCP are for loosers:
Hillary wants to take away your guns
Source?
ban them from sale in the USA
Source?
give them to those guys in exchange for donations
Source?
It behooves no one to lie through hyperbole. All it does it create a bigger rift between people. If Hillary is so awful, you shouldn't need to reach beyond exactly what she says to discredit her.
EDIT: heh, -4 and still no sources. If you are downvoating, you must have sources to show how Hillary wants to take everyone's guns... Or do you just not want people to know that your rhetoric is nothing but hyperbole and fear mongering.
[–] zugz1m0reday 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Hillary is a dirty whore of a politician, whom I don't support, but I like what you're doing here.
[–] filthycasual 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
'Hillary wants to take your guns.':
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T7rXaeCTos&t=11m48s
"I believe weapons of war have no place on our streets." in reference to 'assault weapons like those used in orlando and san bernardino'.
'ban them from sale in the USA' I would argue that the first example supports this as well. But both examples point towards the idea that Hillary supports taking guns away and banning them from sale.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJo5XIG3LbA&t=33m12s
'give them to those guys in exchange for donations'
i'm not sure if this site is biased, but you can just do some searches on 'hillary clinton arms deals' to find the same information elsewhere, they also link to US government sources in the article:
I didn't up, or down vote you, but all this information wasn't hard to find. Normally, I wouldn't bat an eye at a request for a source, but Hillary no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt. I've found that if I hear about some scummy thing she's done, it's usually true. I've also noticed that if there's some scummy thing any of her opponents are accused of doing, she's probably done those too.
[–] sniper98g 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago (edited ago)
Rather, experts say it means that the United States shared an overarching goal with the opposition -- namely, countering Assad -- without actively supporting all elements of that opposition. In the byzantine world of the Syrian opposition, the United States sought to support moderate elements while opposing extremists such as AQI and, later, ISIS.
So they didn't support AQI, they just supported a bunch of people who were fighting with AQI in support of similar causes. Ya, that's totally fucking different.
[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
The moderate rebels in syria actually want Sharia according to polling research.
[–] Voluptuous_Panda 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
[–] Mr_Sir 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
mental gymnastics ensues.