0
1

[–] Mr_Sir 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

mental gymnastics ensues.

0
8

[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Hillary wants to take away your guns, ban them from sale in the USA and give them to those guys in exchange for donations to the clinton foundation?

  • But Trump says

We are going to bomb the shit out of them

5
2

[–] laikaislost 5 points 2 points (+7|-5) ago  (edited ago)

I know I will get the shit downvoted out of me, but CCP are for loosers:

Hillary wants to take away your guns

Source?

ban them from sale in the USA

Source?

give them to those guys in exchange for donations

Source?

It behooves no one to lie through hyperbole. All it does it create a bigger rift between people. If Hillary is so awful, you shouldn't need to reach beyond exactly what she says to discredit her.

EDIT: heh, -4 and still no sources. If you are downvoating, you must have sources to show how Hillary wants to take everyone's guns... Or do you just not want people to know that your rhetoric is nothing but hyperbole and fear mongering.

0
2

[–] zugz1m0reday 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hillary is a dirty whore of a politician, whom I don't support, but I like what you're doing here.

0
1

[–] filthycasual 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

'Hillary wants to take your guns.':

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T7rXaeCTos&t=11m48s

"I believe weapons of war have no place on our streets." in reference to 'assault weapons like those used in orlando and san bernardino'.

'ban them from sale in the USA' I would argue that the first example supports this as well. But both examples point towards the idea that Hillary supports taking guns away and banning them from sale.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJo5XIG3LbA&t=33m12s

'give them to those guys in exchange for donations'

i'm not sure if this site is biased, but you can just do some searches on 'hillary clinton arms deals' to find the same information elsewhere, they also link to US government sources in the article:

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

I didn't up, or down vote you, but all this information wasn't hard to find. Normally, I wouldn't bat an eye at a request for a source, but Hillary no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt. I've found that if I hear about some scummy thing she's done, it's usually true. I've also noticed that if there's some scummy thing any of her opponents are accused of doing, she's probably done those too.

0
0

[–] Pawn ago 

so he wants to continue the forever war, great, now instead of telling us it'll be over the new guy will at least tell us tighten asshole for more.

2
3

[–] Greasy 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Maybe I'm thick or out of the loop, but how is this proof of bias?

8
-5

0
16

[–] sniper98g 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Achive of the Trump article

Rather, experts say it means that the United States shared an overarching goal with the opposition -- namely, countering Assad -- without actively supporting all elements of that opposition. In the byzantine world of the Syrian opposition, the United States sought to support moderate elements while opposing extremists such as AQI and, later, ISIS.

So they didn't support AQI, they just supported a bunch of people who were fighting with AQI in support of similar causes. Ya, that's totally fucking different.

0
7

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The moderate rebels in syria actually want Sharia according to polling research.

0
0

[–] RectalLeakage ago 

How the fuck do you run a poll in a warzone?

0
0

[–] Arrvee ago 

Didn't a memo just come out a couple of days ago that the military knew they were supporting ISIS?

0
3

[–] Voluptuous_Panda 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] muffalettadiver 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Trump is awesome.

0
6

[–] Ruston 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

We have always been at war with Eastasia...

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)