[–] toobaditworks 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago (edited ago)
Isn't it funny that Democrats who pride themselves on being non-racist and talk about the color of a persons skin not being important so much talk about Donald Trump being orange so much.
[–] MacheteSanta 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
So that's why he's hi-energy! Packed with Vitamin C!
I think he would laugh at this ;)
[–] guinness2 1 point 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago (edited ago)
No one should be judged by their race or their color
Agreed, however there are some powerful generalizations that can be made based on race.
For example, have you ever wondered why EVERY black country is shit hole of bestial crime and no amount of education, Affirmative Action or cash handouts seems to overcome their culture of looting and raping and killing? (source)
[–] blueingreen 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Also note that 89% of those people arrested are men. The world should have a temporary 5 year ban on male or black babies in order to lift these communities out of poverty.
No mother should have to raise a child alone. #aborttheblacks
[–] guinness2 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Eh, perhaps the best place for niggers is to be locked in cages where they can't hurt anyone or hurt themselves?
Ms Brown is hardly raising her tribe of nigglets alone just because daddy ran away or is incarcerated. Ms Brown leeches off hard working, educated, productive humans to get all of her free cash gibs. #ThanksObama
[–] FriedFood100 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Very wise words. We are all individuals.
[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
More like PC pabulum to try and appease the current manufactured media nonsense over this judge. I can think of many ways in which I'd judge someone based on their color or sex or age or whatever. If I want to have a face to face discussion about Trump, for example, and want a pro-Trump perspective from a stranger am I likelier to get one from an elderly white male or a black female college student?
This is basically just Trump being politically correct to try and appease his critics. This kind of concession rarely works and he's been successful so far by refusing to back down in these controversies. He's still refusing to back down specifically on the Curiel comments but this statement here is not the usual strong Trump we're used to.
[–] FriedFood100 ago
Yeah, I do worry a lot of people are going to take this as capitulation. "Mexican" is not even a race.
One can be doubtful or suspicious about someone for certain characteristics without judging them. "Judge," 'judgment," "judging" all have multiple senses in their definitions, so it can become quite semantical.
In this sense I take "judging" to mean a condemnation without any or much doubt, which I think foolish to do just based off of race, color, or ethnicity.
[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 1 point 30 points 31 points (+31|-1) ago
It's strikingly obvious that Trump was accusing Judge Curiel of being racist toward HIM due to being of Mexican background. It seems all of the cucks in the GOP, instead of recognizing this, piled on with the shitlib media and have Trump 'recalibrating' (read buckling) some.
There was nothing wrong with Trump's criticism of the judge.
[–] GizaDog 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
It seems "criticism" of government gets you in the hot seat. Lying and coverups get you free passes!
Strange world we live in!
[–] not_shadowbanned_yet 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Statist world we live in.
[–] grlldcheese ago
Not just free passes.
Also, the democratic presidential nomination.
[–] ding0bait 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
To be fair, Trump could have been much clearer in attacking the judge based on his relationship with La Raza or his stance on illegals. His criticism, while valid, could have been packaged better for the morons.
Fact is, this judge doesn't see himself as 'american'. He see's himself as Mexican, then hispanic, then maybe somewhere down the line, American. I feel this is what Trump was pointing out. At least, to me, that was hit-you-over-the-head clear-as-fucking-day about his comment.
[–] pissed 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
"Fact is, this judge doesn't see himself as 'american" really? Do you know this judge? Trump has a right to criticize the judge based on his (the judge) behavior but not on his heritage. Also, why, as a political candidate, did he air his personal problems when he should have been expressing his policies or attacking Hillary? The guy's ego surpasses everything including good sense.
[–] epsilona01 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
According to Scott Adams, this is by design. It moves the discussion beyond "is he a member of La Raza" which we now accept, and then the argument is about whether it's racist. Which the media will argue on and on, but anyone who actually looks at what was said will likely disagree with that. And that adds to the list of "media lies" he can use. Since it's easier on the internet to go and see when the media lies, you now have a percentage of people who will go and look, and some that won't bother and will happily accept what they're told on TV. The ones that won't bother, well they were probably against Trump, and they were going to vote against him or not at all. The ones that will - even if they don't necessarily like what he said - can still see the media manipulations and that still works to his favor.