[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
I've said this many times, to many people of all shapes and sizes, races and ideologies.
It is a sacred teaching, known by all but realized by few:
DARWINISM!
[–] [deleted] 0 points 132 points 132 points (+132|-0) ago
[–] 1HepCat 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
And yet it does hold a perverse, self-fulfilling logical consistency:
I am a violent would-be criminal and I carry a weapon. Therefore, some people who carry weapons are violent would-be criminals. Since both propositions hold (especially the first), it's reasonable to expect that I will ATTACK!!
[–] 14936786-02 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Reminds me of that girl that saw a guy with a holstered pistol and took a picture. The comment she put with it was saying something about how she could disarm the guy the guy and fire all rounds with ease.
[–] markrod420 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It is funny how hard the left seems to be actively trying to bring about orwells nightmare.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 44 points 45 points (+45|-1) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 33 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
No its alright because TEHY do it.
Dont discourage the hugbox think its like natural selection.
[–] 5406942? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It would probably depend on which cop responded to the incident (although I doubt that she would be smart enough to call 911 before she tried this, and after she did this, whoever she attacked would be justified by self-defense if she was dumb enough to explain it the same way).
[–] Ziekk 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Using any force to hold someone (who hasn't done anything incredibly illegal) against their will waiting for police is False Imprisonment. You can't touch anyone, man. The only ones who can are shopkeeps in many states, and that's for theft.
All this is very state specific, but no, you cannot hold someone against their will because you believe they may be doing something against the law for that individual.
[–] Washingtons6pack 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago
"Him"... Women can't open carry guns? How sexist.
[–] YodaDankfish 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Fucking crazy bitch. If she just sprays someone unprovoked, that is assault. In that case the guy with the gun now has a legal right to defend himself with his firearm/beat the hell out of her.
[–] MisterWings 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It is battery but more or less the same thing. Also stealing someone else's firearm is a felony of the federal kind and she would either end up shot and/or arrested and sent to prison and also sued by the gun owner. It is literally the perfect storm of bad ideas wrapped into one.
Oh and possibly add unlawful detainment to the mix too depending on how the prosecutor takes it.
[–] hatchrawerberyl 0 points 58 points 58 points (+58|-0) ago
I don't find this funny. I find it disturbing that anyone would think like that.
[–] PM_nudes_pls 0 points 28 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago
I find it disturbing as well, but I also find it funny. more natural selection needs to happen.
[–] CobraStallone 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
More like their deluded fantasies, but yeah, even then.
[–] ShortWarrior 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
In real life, she'd see the gun, shit herself, and then continue standing in the line for Starbucks.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] AnoInc 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Or violent death.
[–] Totenglocke 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So you're saying that you're not a Democrat?