[–] Xennios 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
Meh, he's one of the few that actually seems willing to engage different viewpoints, so I'll cut him some slack. Probably the only way to question certain things on GAF anyways, and thus start a "conversation", is to feign obliviousness.
[–] Dillinger48 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
After 11 circle jerking pages of virtue signalling -
GAAAMERRRGAAATE
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=204410817&postcount=531
[–] Rabidfish88 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's a common SJW tactic - pretend not to know the meaning of some SJW bullshit, get some normal person who hates SJWs to explain it, then yell for a mod when the explanation contains negative thought about SJWs.
[–] ToiletPaper 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
http://imgur.com/gallery/40NAs
Mansplaining, the conversation equivalent of when a women hits a man, he hits her back, then she says "you cant hit me, Im a women!".
[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] JohnnyPhatsaqs 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nah. I'm betting on this thread being a two fer for the op. Gets to bring up an sjw topic that self important shit dicks love to write "progressive" talking points in.
Secondly, op will then get to appear open minded when he listens and believes. They love to "educate" people.