[–] 5267743? 1 point 12 points 13 points (+13|-1) ago
SJWs like Trigglypuff v/GoneWild? Eww.
[–] Ioxvm 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
No. Thou shalt not mention Trigglypuff in that way.. bad. Downvote for you. BAD /u/Skyrock.. bad! Just fucking EWW! EWWWWW!
[–] FeminismIsCancer 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
While I agree that it's retarded, it's not like the same isn't true for the other side according to the OP.
[–] DeltaBravoTango 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
THE NEW FUROR
FUROR
Trump may not be the new Führer, but he has created quite the furor.
[–] spookybm 5 points 3 points 8 points (+8|-5) ago
I find that insulting, comparing a person who literally destroyed the economy to someone that was pretty much the ONLY PERSON ALIVE to pull a country out of depression.
False equivalence? Nah, POLAR OPPOSITES.
Liberals should really read what he has done and not use the rhetoric that they were thought in LIBERAL schools.
The man has done MORE for his country than the last 5 generations of Presidents COMBINED. He even did what FDR could not.
[–] [deleted] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
[–] TimeDilation 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
He can't mean Hitler, he said ONLY PERSON ALIVE, I think he means Barack "Lame Duck" Obama.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
literally hitler
[–] AmaleksHairyAss 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
liberal this, liberal that. This is, as usual, an unfunny ham handed political rant.
[–] microlyfe 0 points 23 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago
And Democrats compared Bush to Hitler. Nothing has changed. People just like comparing people they don't like to Hitler.
[–] 5268046? 2 points 8 points 10 points (+10|-2) ago
Everyone but neo-con Republicans compared Bush jr to Hitler.
He invaded countries on nothing but a paper-thin ruse and re-introduced internment camps, after all.
[–] Lake 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
No. Anyone that argues their point and doesn't start name calling didn't call him Hitler.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Why not Mao? He had a way greater killcount and was more directlly involved killing his own people/government.
[–] Broc_Lia [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hitler has been used as propaganda by the allied nations ever since world war 2. If they paint him as ultimate evil, then they, by comparison, must be ultimate good for (nearly) killing him.
Stalin, by comparison, was one of the allies, so he kinda gets a pass and a sort of goofy "Uncle Joe" treatment. Mao is irrelevant: The US never fought him. Most westerners don't really know anything about him other than "he was a communist, right? So that means he was all about improving conditions for workers.' There was even a line of cafes serving general east asian food named after him in my city. I genuinely don't think they realised what a shithead he was, but they took down the posters of his face after complaints.