0
1

[–] icamefromreddityo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The group’s national charge charged that Watson’s spiritual place and following deletion of critical remarks “have caused and are causing immediate and irreparable harm, loss or damage” to the plaintiffs.

agenda revealed

0
0

[–] TelescopiumHerscheli ago 

Damn, I read that as "Tennessee postman", and was wondering what all the fuss was about...

0
2

[–] myleperfriend 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

who wrote that article... it reads like some kind of 'ESL' translation

0
0

[–] PraiseIPU ago 

probably a bot

0
0

[–] 5244492? ago 

Lawman ready to take on atheist group

Wut wut? Why would I care?

[–] [deleted] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] jozsefsz 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Perhaps others will some day become as euphoric as yourself, enlightened by their own intelligence. (FYI, as an educated believer in God, I often chuckle at the ridiculous fairy tales atheists swallow so that they can pretend to know -- agnosticism is far more intellectually defensible.) You do realize your kind of atheist shares a great deal in common with the worst of the religious (arrogance, self-righteousness, belittling others) don't you?

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
-2

[–] BannedFromVoat_wtf 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Join me on v/edgelordfedora3001tipping

Let us bask in brony porn and gaytheism!

1
0

[–] ThisIsCathartic 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I think whoever wrote that article was drunk, or just naturally stupid. That said, I got the impression that he's being sued because his statements were made in an official capacity, hence the lawsuit. That's good, and you should be glad people "care" about that.

I don't give a fuck about your definition of atheism, so I guess I'm even more truly atheist than you are, and that's while being agnostic. Suck it.